[geocentrism] Re: I looked in
- From: Alan Griffin <ajg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:39:32 +0100
On 17 Aug, <geocentric@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Philip wrote:
> > As they are now, Alan and Mike will never be a Faraday or any notable
> > scientist. They are followers, knowing what but not how to think, and
> > thus that is the end of their worth to science. Only if there is a
> > student of theirs who questions their dogma , will we be able to say
> > that their teaching was of any benifit.
> I most certainly do doubt I will ever be a Farady or any scientist of
> note. So what? Do you think your theorom that a/b=a is going to
> revolution mathematics or something LOL
No, I don't think I will ever be a Faraday or a Newton, but I do
admire them!
> > But miracles do happen, check it out , Mike and Alan. If you do your
> > life becomes a whole new experience.
> Don't waste your time trying to convert me. Where's all this scientific
> evidence I've heard about that shows that the earth don't move?
They've already shot that bolt. They think that Michelson-Morley
proves it (when all it proves is there's no aether). They also keep
talking about water-filled telescopes, which I've also shown to be
incorrect.
Philip then likens the solar system to an LP record. The molecules
of the the record are rigidly held together by forces (inverse square law
attraction and inverse 8th power law of repulsion) which are in
equilibrium. When the record rotates, these forces change slightly to
produce the centripetal force (which Philip does not accept!) to keep the
molecules from flying off the edge of the disc.
There are NO such forces on the stars to keep them in orbit round
the earth (or sun). Philip tells us that the "aether" can produce this
force. If so, any star moving out from the centre would be slowed down by
the force, and any star moving inwards would speed up.
Thus binary stars rotating round each other would experience this
speeding up and slowing down as they orbited, and this would be observable
in my brother's radial velocity observations. It isn't. Maybe Philip can
explain why this significant effect cannot be observed?
Thanks for your support Mike!
Alan
Other related posts:
