A few years ago I wrote a paper on Special Relativity and sent it in to a very major physics journal for review. Three months went by and I had heard nothing, so I e-mailed the chief editor, Prof. something-or-other. He said he would enquire of the reviewer.
The reviewer then wrote back that he had found no flaw in the paper, but that "it must be wrong because SR is right."
I then discussed it, via e-mail, with a friend of mine who teaches the subject to undergraduates. In the space of less than one week, I had some very valuable feedback on the paper.
If you write outside the paradigm you will not get it published for you; you will have to do it yourself. That requires a large degree of effort and dedication. You will also have to brace yourself for derision and ridicule. People will attempt to "teach" you what you yourself are qualified to teach their teachers.
When Robert Sungenis and Robert Bennett sat down to write their book, "Galileo Was Wrong," they no doubt did not have any major publishing house in the least bit interested. They would almost certainly have received no funding from anywhere.
When Steven suggested that he and I do a geocentric model of the universe for a PC, we had no funding. We gave away what we could and we asked a very modest price to those who we hoped would buy it. That modest price included a small amount of profit. That profit went into buying one book and part-way towards a new computer for use in producing the next version.
Those of us on this forum (and elsewhere) who produce things on this subject that may prove to be beneficial to others and to the advancement of the subject matter, do so for reasons far, far removed from monetary gain. If we were interested in monetary gain, then we would be telling the earth what it wants to hear, like Dawkins and Hawking (perhaps we would also consider changing our names to something with 'awkin' in it?).
I am not telling anyone off here. All I am doing is testifying that the production of something like GWW takes a great deal of time, commitment and devotion.
Are we not entitled to try and reclaim production costs?
If we want to advance this subject then we can continue the struggle in isolation and wonder sometimes why we bother, or we can pull together a bit more and show some enthusiasm.
Neville.
