[geocentrism] GWW
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:28:26 +0100
Dear Allen,
I agree that GWW is an extremely useful reference book to have to hand but as I
mentioned in an earlier posting, its religious content is likely to make it a
non-starter for non-religious people etc. If the book were simply an historical
account of the development of the scientific experimentation and understanding
of the cosmos, it would be a winner! (in terms of giving it to un-believing
friends as a means of subsequent evangelism).
I have yet to reply to Robert Bennett's reply with regard to making an edited
version. I am extremely busy at the moment but I shall make it a priority to
contact the 2 Roberts on this suggestion soon.
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Allen Daves
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 12:04 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
2. Although I have known of many of these Phenomena from elsewhere the ones i
use most frequently and quote are found in fact found in GWW. That is why is it
such a useful book for everyone to have. It goes along way in putting most of
the various "anomalies" in one reference book. I encourage everyone to get a
copy and do some research.. If there was such a thing as required reading/
reference material I would certainly consider it such.
Other related posts:
