[geocentrism] Re: An amusing article
- From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
Phil,
The issuse is not the first rainbow but the first rain and the text states
that God did not let it rain but does indicate how things were wattered absent
of rain.....Genisis 2:5-6..."there went a mist form the earth and watered the
whole face of the ground".....all things considered Nevilles point was valid in
that it needs to be addressed............i did so in my last post .......My
last post:
Where does it mention clouds in the Genesis?....MS knows that clouds are formed
via condensation seeds. Further, they claim Cosmic rays/particles entering
earths atmosphere are the primary external of man made, condensation
seeds......(trapped cosmic rays form the aurora borealis and such).....The
amount of these cosmic rays that get into our atmosphere are directly
correlated to solar activity.. at solar maximum the earths Magnetic field is
significantly "blown away"/ reduced in its effectiveness, so as to allow for
cosmic particles to enter the earths magnetic field...... ...However, even MS
asserts that in the past the earths magnetic field was significantly stronger
and on a much smaller earth it would be a more dense field as well..thus it is
conceivable that no cosmic rays were allowed to reach earth in any significant
quantities to allow for condensation seeds in the atmosphere....strong mag
field = no cosmic rays=condensation seeds =no clouds=no
rain .......................
I'm from the southeast and on a hot humid days (even without any clouds the
atmosphere can hold plenty of muggy humidity)..... the morings will be cool
with plenty of dew.......
----- Original Message ----
From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2007 3:20:29 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: An amusing article
Philip touches upon an interesting problem here when he says that before the
Flood there was no rain. However, because of the way that the water cycle works
(mentioned in Eccl. along with geocentrism), this could not have been true.
Neville
No problem Neville A closer read of Genises reveals that God used the rainbow
as a sign to remember His covenant not to destroy by flood again. This did not
say explicitly that it was the first rainbow. Hence rain has always been .
I had read years ago, and believed, erroneously, that this was the first time a
rainbow had ever occured.. such is a childish myth apparently, as my reading
today shows no such thing. The evangelical documentary was Bible based, and was
the same documentary which gave me the idea of the water above making a lenze
in the atmosphere, where they claimed the stars were more brilliant preflood.
You dispensed with this claim before.
I retract my words and will reajust the overview.
Philip.
13 I will set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be the sign of a covenant
between me, and between the earth. 14 And when I shall cover the sky with
clouds, my bow shall appear in the clouds: 15 And I will remember my covenant
with you, and with every living soul that beareth flesh: and there shall no
more be waters of a flood to destroy all flesh. 16 And the bow shall be in the
clouds, and I shall see it, and shall remember the everlasting covenant, that
was made between God and every living soul of all flesh which is upon the earth.
Other related posts:
