[geocentrism] Re: An amusing article
- From: "allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
Where does it mention clouds in the Genesis?....MS knows that clouds are formed
via condensation seeds. Further, they claim Cosmic rays/particles entering
earths atmosphere are the primary external of man made, condensation
seeds......(trapped cosmic rays form the aurora borealis and such).....The
amount of these cosmic rays that get into our atmosphere are directly
correlated to solar activity.. at solar maximum the earths Magnetic field is
significantly "blown away"/ reduced in its effectiveness, so as to allow for
cosmic particles to enter the earths magnetic field...... ...However, even MS
asserts that in the past the earths magnetic field was significantly stronger
and on a much smaller earth it would be a more dense field as well..thus it is
conceivable that no cosmic rays were allowed to reach earth in any significant
quantities to allow for condensation seeds in the atmosphere....strong mag
field = no cosmic rays=condensation seeds =no clouds=no
rain .......................
I understand the water cycle..so...why could it not be true?......im missing
somthing..?
----- Original Message ----
From: Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2007 11:56:59 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: An amusing article
Philip touches upon an interesting problem here when he says that before the
Flood there was no rain. However, because of the way that the water cycle works
(mentioned in Eccl. along with geocentrism), this could not have been true.
Neville
www.GeocentricUniverse.com
-----Original Message-----
From: pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:48:22 +1000
http://www.bom.gov.au/weather/radar/about/using_radar_images.shtml
Ok so I have not yet read Allen on the flood, and I know he has doen
considerable work on it.
Therefore I'll keep the world at its current size..
(genesis1 - 2 and the spirit of God moved over the waters.. anybody tell me
what waters given this is before anything was made. )
BTW.
But I notice in chapter 8 mention of the fountains of the deep, so perhaps that
is the answer for the amount of the water. Not all and probable not even most
of it came from rain, but from under the earth, where of course it could
return.
Not all returned.. Before the flood there was no rain, as there was no
rainbows. Hence much vapor must have been left in the atmosphere to keep it
raining . But if there was a sea, and a sun before the flood, how come there
was no clouds to make rain? But then we need mountains to make it rain..
Perhaps mmm yes.
Despite Nevilles rain from space, I may theorise that only earth water from the
deep provided both the rain and the fountains. Volcanic heat could have spewed
heaps out as vapor which on saturation would fall as rain.
Just being practical and negating all of the above, records show that max
rainfall called unusual can be no more than 400mm or 16 inches per hour1.3 ft
per hour X 9,60 = 1300 ft in 40 days over the whole globe.. Oh well thats
still some flood, and maybe geologically no mountains , but hard to believe,
but getting easier.
Still the fountains are running faster than the rain. And we know the earth was
a different place afterwards . Perhaps receding water back into the deep and
geological heat pushed Mt. Arayat up towards the ark. along with a lot of other
mountains.. a sort of roughing up of the place.. bingo now it can rain.
Of course I can dream Paul.. I used to dream about monkeys becoming men.. saw
it happen in "the planet of the apes" ... er now hang on it was men becoming
monkeys.. Great movie.. the remake was so full of attacking religion, it was a
big flop. It concentrated too much on how people think the volcano is a
god... The Heston version did give the scientists much of the credit for the
end of the world...
Going back to Allen's work now..
Philip.
Other related posts:
