Re: [foxboro] replacing field Op panels
- From: "Jim Mowrey" <jmowrey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:03:24 -0500
I've gone the hardened PC route and set up all WP's and AW's with second
Ethernet ports and extra DM licenses. The PC's connect via a switch, so
that we can easily move a PC to run off of another workstation when we wish
to back up the workstation. This has worked very well for us, and saved us
lots of $.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Corey R Clingo
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 1:15 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] replacing field Op panels
Just throwing out some ideas; I haven't personally tried any of this. Each
has its advantages and disadvantages
"Industrial" environmentally-hardened PC with Ethernet running some
Windows variant and Exceed/GoGlobal/VNC, or custom OS with X server, and
remote DM/FV from an AW/WP. These can be had with solid-state flash disks
(no moving parts), panel-mount form factors, and NEMA 4/7 enclosures. A
special I/A environment could be set up to limit what the field operator
could see/change.
Panelview or something similar connected via FBM224/FDSI and Modbus. The
Panelview would have to be capable of acting as a slave (polled device)
unless the FDSI supports being a Modbus slave itself (I don't believe the
FBM224 does).
Other variations: OPC connectivity, for example, or using some fiber-optic
KVM extenders to put only the monitor and any input devices in the field
with the CPU (either a WP or a non-I/A PC) residing in the rack room.
Corey Clingo
BASF Corp.
"BrianLong" <blong@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
03/16/2005 11:42 AM
Please respond to foxboro
To: "Foxboro"
cc:
Subject: [foxboro] replacing field Op panels
I have a need to remove a number of operator hardwired field panels. I
want
to replace them with a "display" panel. All I/O is wired to the I/A. If
it
was a PLC I would install a panelview, anyone got any ideas?
Brian Long
Arkansas Kraft
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] replacing field Op panels
- From: Corey R Clingo
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] replacing field Op panels
- » Re: [foxboro] replacing field Op panels
- » Re: [foxboro] replacing field Op panels
- » Re: [foxboro] replacing field Op panels
- » Re: [foxboro] replacing field Op panels
- » Re: [foxboro] replacing field Op panels
- » Re: [foxboro] replacing field Op panels
- » Re: [foxboro] replacing field Op panels
- » Re: [foxboro] replacing field Op panels
- Re: [foxboro] replacing field Op panels
- From: Corey R Clingo