Re: [foxboro] OSI tags for Foxboro I/A
- From: "Lowell, Tim:" <Tim.C.Lowell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:44:37 -0500
We use the Foxboro/Honeywell tag name as the PI tag, unless it is a
controller, CALC block with more than one output, or an Application
Object, like a DMC point. In those cases, we put a period at the end of
the tag name and then some kind of extension. For controllers we use
PV, SP, OP, and MA (our PI administrator preferred the Honeywell
nomenclature); for CALC blocks we use RO0x, BO0x, or II0x; and for
Application Objects we use the name of the parameter we're historizing,
like DEP for a DMC dependent variable.
Tim Lowell
Control Systems Engineer
ConocoPhillips Trainer Refinery
(610) 364-8362
tim.c.lowell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Clement, Mark (KIDDMET)
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 1:38 PM
To: 'foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: [foxboro] OSI tags for Foxboro I/A
Hi All,
What does everyone use as a tag naming convention ?
Just loops numbers or combination loop# and area # or something better ?
What works best from end user perspective ?
Regards
Mark
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
