Re: [foxboro] "Like for Like" kind FBM100 series REV-0L

  • From: "McQuaid, Paul" <paul.mcquaid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:45:49 -0500

If it helps.........I did Validation for a manufacturer supplying equipment 
into some Pharmaceutical sites in the UK a while back so this might be old 
information, but for Hardware at least the Phrase "FORM,FIT or FUNCTION" was 
the test used to define the need for re-validation, so In my view, and this was 
sometimes tested with customers, auditors, (successfully back then at least), 
as long as it doesn't change the way a validated process is functioning then is 
does not require re validation. In the case of my sites The manufacturer 
supplied a document that there was no change to the form fit or function and 
that was acceptable to the auditors.....

i.e. if a Microprocessor is updated through lack of availability as long as it 
does exactly the same job then it is acceptable.

BUT I also know many sites where as far a Software is concerned a software 
version MUST remain the same, as there is in, their (auditors) opinion no proof 
that it does EXACTLY the same thing without re validation :-(

I suppose its fair to say that the Auditors decision, will be the rule, and 
that may differ dependant on the site and potentially the person, and possibly 
whether his/her partner was nice to them last night :-)

Best Regards

Paul McQuaid

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Landry, Scott
Sent: 19 March 2015 11:44
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] "Like for Like" kind FBM100 series REV-0L




   Ken is correct in that this information is conveyed internally through a 
Engineering Release/Revise/Cancel Notice.

   Many reasons for a ERN,  example , a component is no longer available from 
ManufacturerA so a compatible component
   from ManufacturerB is used in its place and the Hardware Revision letter is 
changed to reflect this.


    Regards,


    Scott

________________________________________
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Joseph M. Riccardi [Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 8:13 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] "Like for Like" kind FBM100 series REV-0L

Scott,

I appreciate that explanation but the unknown factor is still what changed from 
the REV-0L to the REV-0P level.  In other words, how does the certifying 
authority know that the differences in the hardware/software will have no 
impact on final product?

I am still hoping Ken's suggestion holds water...


Joseph M. Riccardi
386-451-7607 Cell

Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

"To give real service you must add something that cannot be bought or measured 
with money; and that is sincerity and integrity." - Donald A. Adams

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Landry, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 5:39 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] "Like for Like" kind FBM100 series REV-0L



   Revision Level typically only makes a difference when it is below the 
suggested field usable Revision Level.
   Foxboro also has what we call a minimum shippable Revision Level,  which is 
usually higher than the min. field useable
   level but always at least at the  min. field useable level.  Hardware that 
is in the Mature and Lifetime Lifecycle phase and
   comes from MEP or Repair or NOS stock is typically revised up to the latest 
Revision Level if possible.


    Regards,



    Scott


________________________________________
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Joseph M. Riccardi [Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 6:51 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] "Like for Like" kind FBM100 series REV-0L

Ken,

I presented your position to the engineer responsible and he bought it 
soooooo...

Thanks for the advice.


Joseph M. Riccardi
386-451-7607 Cell

Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

"To give real service you must add something that cannot be bought or measured 
with money; and that is sincerity and integrity." - Donald A. Adams

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Ken Heywood
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 12:14 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] "Like for Like" kind FBM100 series REV-0L

Maybe it has not been an issue. If the part is replaced with the same part 
number, revision level should not make a difference to a certifying authority. 
Especially so if Foxboro did not change the specifications according to the PSS 
sheet. Typically, Foxboro issued a new part number if the functionality and/or 
specifications changed.


Thank You,
Ken Heywood
Calibration Laboratory Manager

PROCESS CONTROL SERVICES, INC.
Established in 1983

http://www.processcontrolservices.com

mailto:KHeywood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Telephone: 734-453-0620
Wireless: 508-241-2040

===============================================

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Joseph M. Riccardi
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 2:36 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] "Like for Like" kind FBM100 series REV-0L

It's never a good sign when you get no responses.  The subject must be taboo.  
:-(

Going once, going twice,...


Joseph M. Riccardi
386-451-7607 Cell

Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

"To give real service you must add something that cannot be bought or measured 
with money; and that is sincerity and integrity." - Donald A. Adams

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Joseph M. Riccardi
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 10:40 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] "Like for Like" kind FBM100 series REV-0L

Folks,
We recently had an FBM01 REV-0L fail and replaced it with a REV-0P version.
In the Nuclear, Pharma, and I am sure other industries that require validation, 
the documentation required to support replacement parts of a "Like for Like" 
kind is simpler.  I cannot find any reference in the GCS web site that would 
point me to documentation for the various hardware revision levels that would 
support this "Like for Like" kind.  Does one exist?  What do other Nuclear, 
Pharma, and other industries that require validation do in this case?

Thanks


Joseph M. Riccardi
386-451-7607 Cell

Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"To give real service you must add something that cannot be bought or measured 
with money; and that is sincerity and integrity." - Donald A. Adams






_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems 
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. 
Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html

foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave





_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems 
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. 
Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html

foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave




_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems 
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. 
Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html

foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave





_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems 
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. 
Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html

foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________

*** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or attached 
files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. 
If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please 
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from 
your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its 
contents to any other person.


_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems 
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. 
Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html

foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave





_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems 
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. 
Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html

foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________

*** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or attached 
files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. 
If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please 
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from 
your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its 
contents to any other person.


_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems 
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. 
Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html

foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________

*** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or attached 
files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. 
If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please 
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from 
your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its 
contents to any other person.
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: