Re: [foxboro] "Like for Like" kind FBM100 series REV-0L

  • From: Ken Heywood <KHeywood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 19:13:35 +0000

Maybe it has not been an issue. If the part is replaced with the same part 
number, revision level should not make a difference to a certifying authority. 
Especially so if Foxboro did not change the specifications according to the PSS 
sheet. Typically, Foxboro issued a new part number if the functionality and/or 
specifications changed.


Thank You,
Ken Heywood
Calibration Laboratory Manager

PROCESS CONTROL SERVICES, INC.
Established in 1983

http://www.processcontrolservices.com

mailto:KHeywood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Telephone: 734-453-0620
Wireless: 508-241-2040

===============================================

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Joseph M. Riccardi
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 2:36 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] "Like for Like" kind FBM100 series REV-0L

It's never a good sign when you get no responses.  The subject must be taboo.  
:-(

Going once, going twice,...


Joseph M. Riccardi
386-451-7607 Cell

Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

"To give real service you must add something that cannot be bought or measured 
with money; and that is sincerity and integrity." - Donald A. Adams

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Joseph M. Riccardi
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 10:40 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] "Like for Like" kind FBM100 series REV-0L

Folks,
We recently had an FBM01 REV-0L fail and replaced it with a REV-0P version.
In the Nuclear, Pharma, and I am sure other industries that require validation, 
the documentation required to support replacement parts of a "Like for Like" 
kind is simpler.  I cannot find any reference in the GCS web site that would 
point me to documentation for the various hardware revision levels that would 
support this "Like for Like" kind.  Does one exist?  What do other Nuclear, 
Pharma, and other industries that require validation do in this case?

Thanks


Joseph M. Riccardi
386-451-7607 Cell

Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"To give real service you must add something that cannot be bought or measured 
with money; and that is sincerity and integrity." - Donald A. Adams






_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems 
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. 
Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html

foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave





_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems 
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. 
Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html

foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: