Re: [foxboro] CP40 to CP40B Upgrade - UNIX V6.3
- From: Terry Doucet <doucet427@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 09:29:02 -0500
Joe,
Another item that requires some care is the fact that the CP40B incorporates
memory error detection and correction. This takes up some cpu power. There
were instances where a CP40A (original CP40) would run OK but the CP40B
experienced overruns. The excel spreadsheet for each type of CP could be
used to try and determine the loading difference you can expect to see. The
absolute number on the spreadsheets (CP40B and CP40A) may not be the same as
real performance but the ratio excel CP40B / CP40A, should give you expected
performance compared to your current CP40A station display load.
If my memory is correct, high field bus load made the situation worse.
Terry
> From: Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [foxboro] CP40 to CP40B Upgrade - UNIX V6.3
> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 19:58:41 -0800
>
> Barry,
>
> Thanks for the feedback, even if the news is bad. I'll read up on B0400SD
> this weekend. Right now it is Miller Time; or in my case, Pinot Noir
> Time...
>
>
> Joseph M. Riccardi
> 386-451-7607 Cell
>
> Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "To give real service you must add something that cannot be bought or
> measured with money; and that is sincerity and integrity." - Donald A. Adams
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Barry Heap
> Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 7:46 PM
> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [foxboro] CP40 to CP40B Upgrade - UNIX V6.3
>
> Hi Joseph,
> The 40 & 40Bs are hardware interchangeable, but your hopes may be dashed re:
> no re-committal.
>
> B0400SD details the procedure --- that should provide all the info you need
> about CP40 to CP40B conversion.
>
> Regards,
>
> Barry Heap
>
> > Are they interchangeable, same
>
> > hardware connections, no re-commit?
>
> > Hoping this is something we can do on our own without an outage if there
> are no hardware compatibility issues and a recommit is not required.
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your
> own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
