RE: Soka|OWA 2003 & authentication

  • From: "Michael B. Smith" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:47:48 -0400

I have both basic and IWA turned on. This lets both IE and non-MS
browsers connect.


From: Robert Lawson [mailto:rlawson@xxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 3:38 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: RE: [exchangelist] RE: Soka|OWA 2003 & authentication

  What authentication method are you using for web OWA access with HTTP?
I'm looking to see what our  non-SSL options for OWA.  It seems the two
choices are "Digest authentication for Windows domain servers" or
"Integrated Windows Authentication".  All our email users have network
  An aside to other post... our experience is that OWA is very zippy
both on our LAN and from web.
Thanks, Robert


From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:michael@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Fri 4/29/2005 11:44 AM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: Soka|OWA 2003 & authentication

Yes. I'm doing both http and https. I have no FE servers.


From: Robert Lawson [mailto:rlawson@xxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 1:13 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: Soka|OWA 2003 & authentication

  Is anyone using OWA 2003 over the web without forms based
authentication?   If so, which HTTP authentication method are using with

  It seems that if you use a FE server (because you have multiple BE
servers), then you have to use FBA.  

Thanks, Robert


Robert Lawson
Database Administrator/email Administrator
Soka University of America
1 University Drive
Aliso Viejo, CA. 92656
main: 949.480.4000 fax: 949.480.4001
direct: 949.480.4224 rlawson@xxxxxxxx

List Archives:
Exchange Newsletters:
Exchange FAQ:
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
World of Windows Networking:
Leading Network Software Directory:
No.1 ISA Server Resource Site:
Windows Security Resource Site:
Network Security Library:
Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions:
You are currently subscribed to this Discussion List as:
To unsubscribe visit
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Other related posts: