No doubt more work then it's worth, but how about a front server that queues the mail? (Although, I'd just argue for more space/ new server). John Sgt John Sanborn john.o.sanborn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Aleksandar Brankovic Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 6:27 AM To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: Internal Auditor, NDR, MAILBOX QUOTA.....and.... Yes, that is one of the way to resolve situation but I have little obstacle. 3500 users on clustered Exchange COMPAQ ML 570 with 4 procesors PIII 700MHz, and COMPAQ RA4100 (year 2000) Storage subsystem with SCSI 64MB cache (believe or noth with this creepy HW we have 99.9992 availability time during last 2 years). I need to take care about every Mb of storage space L... grrrr, and u know the users Maybe some CDO programming can do the job? From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Zvonimir Bilic Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 2:01 PM To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: Internal Auditor, NDR, MAILBOX QUOTA.....and.... Why not have a setting "Prohibit send/reply" when quota limitation is reached? They will still be able to receive messages. _____ From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Aleksandar Brankovic Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 5:59 AM To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ExchangeList] Internal Auditor, NDR, MAILBOX QUOTA.....and.... Dear all, My wise internal auditor have excellent idea. All users with closed mailboxes cause of quota limitation MUST be informed via e-mail about all messages that are not received because of mailbox quota limit. So, Mailbox is closed, senders sends message, receives NDR `cause recipients mailbox is closed, recipient MUST receive information that he/she didn't receive message because his/her mailbox is FULL HOW?????? Thx in advance