[ExchangeList] Re: Internal Auditor, NDR, MAILBOX QUOTA.....and....

  • From: "Jensen, Douglas" <douglas.jensen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:21:13 -0600

Maybe if you would hire women rather than girls it would work better.
:-)
 
Douglas Jensen
Douglas.Jensen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Douglas.Jensen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Voice (952) 402-9821
Fax (952) 402-9815
Network Administrator
Scott Carver Dakota CAP Agency, Inc.
712 Canterbury Road
Shakopee, MN 55379 
www.capagency.org
<file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/djensen.SCDCAP/Application%20Data
/Microsoft/Signatures/www.capagency.org>  


________________________________

From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Taylor, George
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 3:24 PM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: Internal Auditor, NDR, MAILBOX
QUOTA.....and....


I had a girl working at the Helpdesk a few years ago.  Exchange went
down in the middle of the night and it was her responsibility to notify
us, the next morning when asked about it she stated, "I sent you an
email letting you know......", bout the same as "Send them an email
letting them know we blocked an email ....."
 
 
Don't ya love Administration.

________________________________

From: Sanborn, John NGAZ [mailto:john.o.sanborn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:51 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: Internal Auditor, NDR, MAILBOX
QUOTA.....and....



No doubt more work then it's worth, but how about a front server that
queues the mail?   (Although, I'd just argue for more space/ new
server).

 

John

 

Sgt John Sanborn
john.o.sanborn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Aleksandar
Brankovic
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 6:27 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: Internal Auditor, NDR, MAILBOX
QUOTA.....and....

 

Yes, that is one of the way to resolve situation but I have little
obstacle. 3500 users on clustered Exchange COMPAQ ML 570  with 4
procesors  PIII 700MHz, and COMPAQ RA4100 (year 2000) Storage subsystem
with SCSI 64MB cache (believe or noth with this creepy HW we have
99.9992 availability time during last 2 years). I need to take care
about every Mb of storage space L... grrrr, and u know the users 

Maybe some CDO programming  can do the job?

 

From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Zvonimir Bilic
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 2:01 PM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: Internal Auditor, NDR, MAILBOX
QUOTA.....and....

 

Why not have a setting "Prohibit send/reply" when quota limitation is
reached? They will still be able to receive messages.

 

________________________________

From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Aleksandar
Brankovic
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 5:59 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Internal Auditor, NDR, MAILBOX QUOTA.....and....

 

Dear all,

My wise internal auditor have excellent idea. All users with closed
mailboxes cause of quota limitation MUST be informed  via e-mail  about
all messages that are not received because of mailbox quota limit.

So,

Mailbox is closed, senders sends message, receives NDR `cause recipients
mailbox is closed, recipient MUST receive information that he/she
didn't receive message because his/her mailbox is FULL

 

HOW??????

 

Thx in advance

***Note: The information contained in this message, including any
attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from
disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender
immediately by a "reply to sender only" message and destroy all
electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any
attachments.

Other related posts: