[ewiki] Re: CSS page content classes
- From: "Andy Fundinger" <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ewiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 14:28:28 -0400
Well, wiki.action.WikiPage is not a literal class name, rather Mario and
I have been using it to refer to a group of three class names. The
actual class names are "wiki", the current action ie "view", and the
current page name ie "SandBox". The "wiki" class meets most of the
needs I see for a "text-wiki" or "wiki-page" class, especially when
combined with a "text-footer" class, but it is cheap to add if y'all see
some utility to it.
Andy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Brown [mailto:nada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 1:15 PM
> To: ewiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [ewiki] Re: CSS page content classes
>
>
> >So .text-wiki would include everything in .wiki before the aview
> >sections?
>
> Does "text-wiki" or "wiki.action.WikiPage" better describe
> the purpose of the division/style rule? If one does a better
> job over the other, that is the one which should be used.
>
> That said, I might also suggest choosing a name whose purpose
> can easily be understood by those new to ewiki. Why not
> simply "wiki-page"?
>
> <rb>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________
> Scanned on 16 Jun 2004 18:15:23
> Scanning by http://erado.com
>
Other related posts:
