Hi all: I am wondering if anyone has been using this feature. It certainly has an intrinsic value, but the process is inordinately complex, and I am wondering if this is something we can address by the time 10.5 hits the shelves. I couldn't have achieved it without some expert help. The current procedure would appear to be as follows. Owning neither printer nor embosser, I had to configure some windows printer or other, directing it to print to file, I think I found a generic one. I then had to set up an embosser and give it a name. This also turns out to be the name of the file I wish to print to. With this embosser highlighted I then send text to it in the usual way. Being somewhat of a megalomaniac, I sent a very large file to the print-to-file, this took a while, and of course, there was no prompt for job completion. The other problem is the obvious. The file bares the name of the default configuration, and I would have to rename it. I was hoping to find a dialogue somewhere that would prompt me for a filename, and perhaps some completion message. The old dos command-line utilities, including Duxbury's transf or tranxf give one such a facility, and allow one to know how many pages are printed. Another issue, is whether such a file could include embosser specific codes. Ultimately it might be worthwhile down the road to have something, that in a personal communication George has called PBF, a portable braille format which would mean that a file could be generated with enough information in it to emboss too no matter what embosser. But I jump ahead of myself, here. As I want my file to end with <crs., without <lfs> and no form feeds, at the moment, it is expedient to take a .brf file, and do these deletions in a standard text editor. At the moment, for me this means a shell out to dos, with an external dos screen reader. Any feedback will be valuable, and I won't weep to much if it doesn't make it into the next release. Cheers Jack