[ddots-l] Re: gord latency Re: New computer, help needed

  • From: "Kevin Gibbs" <kevjazz@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:21:47 -0600

Wha's your buffer size?

-----Original Message-----
From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ricky Prevatte
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 10:02 PM
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: gord latency Re: New computer, help needed


My system is nothing compared to yours I have no problem doing what you are
doing.  I only have 512 meg.  As God as my whitness!!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stacy Bleeks" <sbleeks@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 11:39 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: gord latency Re: New computer, help needed


> Hi Bill,
>
> I am using the Presonus Firepod audio controller.  The multiprocessing
> option is not checked.  I have run the wave profiler a few times.
>
>
> my system is 2.8 dual core processor, 2 GB RAM.  It seems that the
> drop
> outs start after there are more than 24 tracks with 4+ soft synths.  I am
> also running some effects such as reverb, delay and compression but all
> are assigned through 4 tidy bus sends.
>
> do you think that this is simply the maximum number of tracks and soft
> synts I can use and still expect consistent performance?  Or do you think
> there is some majic tweaking I can do to improve performance?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Stacy
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William R. McCann" <BillList1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 2:35 PM
> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: gord latency Re: New computer, help needed
>
>
>> Hi, Stacy,
>>
>> What audio interface are you using?  We have recently learned that
>> some manufacturers have not upgraded their drivers to support the
>> SONAR multi-processor option.  Check under Options | Audio | Advanced
>> to see if "Use Multiprocessing Engine" is checked.  If it is, uncheck
>> it, close SONAR, restart and see if you find any major improvements.
>> If you still do not, try running the Wave Profiler (under Options |
>> Audio | General, I believe),
>> close SONAR, restart.
>>
>> One customer who has a very fast quad-core system, learned the hard
>> way (along with us at DD) that the TASCAM 1884 drivers do not support
>> multi-core processing.  Once he unchecked "Use Multi-Processor", all
>> of his drop-outs
>> went away!  Is anyone using the 1884 with the multiprocessing engine
>> checked?  It would be nice if there was an alternative set of drivers.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> On
>> Behalf Of Gordon Kent
>> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 3:50 PM
>> To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: gord latency Re: New computer, help needed
>>
>> What version of Jaws are you using?
>> Gord
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Stacy Bleeks" <sbleeks@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 6:37 AM
>> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: gord latency Re: New computer, help needed
>>
>>
>>> Hi Gord,
>>>
>>> At this point in the project I have turned latency up to 100%,  I'm
>>> just chizeling the track down with some subtle effects.  If I turn
>>> the latency down to even 60% I get the dropout stutter stuff.
>>>
>>> It's weird though,  I can work on this project for about20 minutes
>>> or so with absolutely no trouble and then the drop outs start
>>> happening and I have to start turning the latency up etc. to get
>>> consistent performance otherwise known as no drop outs and no audio
>>> stuttering.  Any ideas why the performance seems to ware down over
>>> time, a relatively short time.
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.0/1137 - Release Date:
>> 11/18/2007
>> 5:15 PM
>>
>>
>> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
>> ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
>> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
>> ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ** and in the Subject line type
>> ** unsubscribe
>> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
>> ** immediately-following link:-
>> ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
>> ** or send a message, to
>> ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
>
> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ** and in the Subject line type
> ** unsubscribe
> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> ** immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> ** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the
> Subject:- faq

** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq


** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to 
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. ddots-l
  3. Archive
  4. 11-2007