[cryptome] Re: TrueCrypt compromised
- From: Shaun O'Connor <capricorn8159@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 10:04:57 +0100
just like skydive oh and lets not forget that Microsoft, who so boldly
proclaim they protect their customers privacy where all the time hiving
off their cloud services to the Nasty Shameless Armholes. skype is as
dead a dodo as far as i am concerned too....could go on and on
but...quite frankly i think the only way the internet has ANY hope is if
we adopt a decentralized protocol rather then rely on a central
registration authority for the allocation of ip addresses. yeah I know
slightly off topic but relevant. .
On 30/05/2014 00:41, Redmond wrote:
>
> I agree. Bitlocker of all products lol. Bitlocker is a joke and a
> Microsoft product.
>
> On May 29, 2014 5:39 PM, <tpb-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:tpb-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> It would be extremely interesting to see statistics about how many
> people are - still - falling in this kind of social engineering trap.
>
> It is so old fashioned that makes one wonder if it is still
> effective, but who knows? Do somebody has the numbers crunched
> from recent research in the field?
>
>
> I think the natural reaction should be: ok, truecrypt is no good,
> what is better than it?
>
> Instead of: ok, truecrypt is no good, what is the stopgap we can
> use meanwhile?
>
>
> How many people react like the first possibility and the second
> possibility?
>
> Any takers?
>
> > Message du 29/05/14 23:33
> > De : "Shaun O'Connor"
> > A : cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Copie à :
> > Objet : [cryptome] Re: TrueCrypt compromised
> >
>
> > it'll cause few headaches that's for sure. my hunch is that a
> > distraction tactic is in play to try and get people away from tc and
> > onto something less secure. but, keeping an open mind on that
> one and
> > considering alternatives....just in case.
> > On 29/05/2014 18:49, Jean-Philippe Décarie-Mathieu wrote:
> > > Oh, I'm nowhere near giving up. I'm aware of the alternatives;
> it's
> > > just that this whole TC story is obscure as hell. Still no
> words from
> > > the developer(s)... It's gotta suck for Tails and other
> projects that
> > > have integrated TC also.
> > >
> > > *Jean-Philippe Décarie-Mathieu*
> > > 514-799-0789 <tel:514-799-0789> - jp@xxxxxxxx
> <mailto:jp@xxxxxxxx> - PGP: 0x2D61F80F
> > >
> > > Le 2014-05-29 13:29, Shaun O'Connor a écrit :
> > >> Don't give up hope too soon!! that's the mentality the NSA
> want to
> > >> foster so people will just roll over and let themselves be
> trampled on.
> > >> On 29/05/2014 15:28, Jean-Philippe Décarie-Mathieu wrote:
> > >>> How fucked are we? Proper fucked?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2014/05/truecrypt_wtf.html
> > >>>
> > >>> Someone here must know something...
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> *Jean-Philippe Décarie-Mathieu*
> > >>> 514-799-0789 <tel:514-799-0789> - jp@xxxxxxxx
> <mailto:jp@xxxxxxxx> - PGP: 0x2D61F80F
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> https://www.resetthenet.org/ *On June 5 2014, this email addrfess
> > >> will NOT be accepting any mails....are you in?*
> > >
> >
> > --
> > https://www.resetthenet.org/ *On June 5 2014, this email
> addrfess will
> > NOT be accepting any mails....are you in?*
> >
>
--
https://www.resetthenet.org/ *On June 5 2014, this email addrfess will
NOT be accepting any mails....are you in?*
Other related posts:
