[cryptome] Re: TrueCrypt compromised
- From: Jeremy Compton <j.compton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 13:18:50 +1200
How does your post here relate to this email list ? Is it not unrelated ?
Jeremy
> Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 00:16:02 +0200
> From: tpb-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: TrueCrypt compromised
>
> Add this routine to your /etc/bash.bashrc:
>
> genpasswd() {
> local l=$1
> [ "$l" == "" ] && l=128
> echo
> "00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000011111111111111111111111111111"
> echo
> "00000000011111111112222222222333333333344444444445555555555666666666677777777778888888888999999999900000000001111111111222222222"
> echo
> "12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678"
> echo
> "-------------------------------------------------------------ruler--------------------------------------------------------------"
> tr -dc 'A-Za-z0-9 ' < /dev/urandom | head -c ${l} | xargs
> tr -dc 'A-Za-z0-9\!\@\#\$\%\& *<>()[]{}_\-~^:;|,. ' < /dev/urandom | head -c
> ${l} | xargs
> tr -dc 'A-Za-z0-9\!\@\#\$\%\&
> ¥¦©®¬¯±µ¶¼½¾¿ÆÐÞßæð÷¤¡×Øøþ¨£¢§ªº°<>()[]{}_\-~^:;|,.¹²³\/* ' < /dev/urandom |
> head -c ${l} | xargs
> echo
> "----------------------------------------------------------description-----------------------------------------------------------"
> echo "first line - web safe - only letters and numbers - 73^${l} possible
> combinations."
> echo "second line - terminal safe - use single quotes in terminal - 98^${l}
> possible combinations."
> echo "third line - generic - displayable signals, use with care - 136^${l}
> possible combinations."
> }
>
> Have fun:
>
> $ genpasswd 32
> 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000011111111111111111111111111111
> 00000000011111111112222222222333333333344444444445555555555666666666677777777778888888888999999999900000000001111111111222222222
> 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678
> -------------------------------------------------------------ruler--------------------------------------------------------------
> eTA9C6Bua1v9cjsHa5yxSz23vdwFKZkj
> G]oL3~>!-LR~[,!2D#^DnH649n MLv2b
> k0Ty�g~PM3M�$�QaBQp�7R/okHKC_3^w
> ----------------------------------------------------------description-----------------------------------------------------------
> first line - web safe - only letters and numbers - 73^32 possible
> combinations.
> second line - terminal safe - use single quotes in terminal - 98^32 possible
> combinations.
> third line - generic - displayable signals, use with care - 136^32 possible
> combinations.
>
>
> I created this code and it is public domain, hack, share, use, change, do
> whatever you want, good password generators are those ran locally by
> yourself, never online. lol
>
>
> > Message du 31/05/14 11:12
> > De : "Shaun O'Connor"
> > A : cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Copie à :
> > Objet : [cryptome] Re: TrueCrypt compromised
> >
>
> > and definitely DO NOT use on-line password generators!!!
> > On 31/05/2014 09:17, Ryan Carboni wrote:
> > > Airgap encryption.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:13 PM, In Harms Way <11414150173@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Now serious: Which open-source programme for container-encryption
> > > of all files and disks the professionals like medical doctors,
> > > lawyers, priests et. al. still can use to fulfil their legal
> > > obligation to store patient or client data 100% secure ????
> > >
> > > To my understanding PGP encryption with UCE (only user has the
> > > private key - private key not grabbed by any webmail etc.) for
> > > e-mails (e.g. via Thunderbird and enigmail) is still not broken
> > > (if user disabled hibernation on his/her machine to avert
> > > pass-phrase stealing from the hibernation dump).
> > >
> > > But which other truecrypt-like open-source programme still stands
> > > strong for file/disk-encryption.?
> > >
> > > Any suggestions?
> > >
> > > Shaun O'Connor wrote, On 30/05/2014 12:06:
> > >> got to agree on that point and tails 1.0 was only released
> > >> recently too!!
> > >> On 30/05/2014 00:14, tpb-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>> Message du 29/05/14 19:49
> > >>>> De : "Jean-Philippe Décarie-Mathieu"
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Oh, I'm nowhere near giving up. I'm aware of the alternatives; it's
> > >>>> just
> > >>>> that this whole TC story is obscure as hell. Still no words from the
> > >>>> developer(s)... It's gotta suck for Tails and other projects that have
> > >>>> integrated TC also.
> > >>>>
> > >>> Other projects will not be affected. That's the nature of open source,
> > >>> you close a door, a window opens.
> > >>>
> > >>> Those interested will keep truecrypt alive, it just takes interest.
> > >>>
> > >>> .
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> https://www.resetthenet.org/ *On June 5 2014, this email addrfess
> > >> will NOT be accepting any mails....are you in?*
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > We have nothing to hide, but something to protect:
> > > LIBERTY, PRIVACY & FREEDOM
> > > - and the people, whose human rights these are.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > https://www.resetthenet.org/ *On June 5 2014, this email addrfess will
> > NOT be accepting any mails....are you in?*
> >
>
Other related posts:
