That's the way I see it too. On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So they are just giving noobs a chance to escape. > Devs are really trying to make games purely a rock paper scissor thing. > > What's the point of a tough situation if you can just nullify it with > some noob feature. > > On 12/06/2014, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Let's put it this way. The movement is basically the same as MK9. But now > > they added a new metere called "agility bar" where you can use it to do > > full/half screen run and do an evasive spacing backdash (i'm not sure if > > normal backdashing will consume such meter/bar...) So if you had 0 > problem > > with movement in mk9. mkx agility bar shouldn't cause you any trouble for > > your own movement. I see it as an escape mechanism more than offensive. > > because you need agility meter to use interactables and "evasive" > backdash. > > the backdash range is big enough to punish wiff. so it SHOULD cause bar. > if > > the normal backdash already does that, then no need to use agility bar. > > > > It doesn't take away anything. It's adding more escape mechanism for > people > > who have a tough time with rushdown characters up on their face... > > > > Also the meter recovers really quickly (like 1-2 sec for full 2 bars? > dunno > > will check again...might be faster)...so it's not like you'll not be able > > to use it every now and then. But if you abuse the meter...then you'll > pay > > for it when you really need it. The bars are there so you don't just > abuse > > the agility bar backdash and jump off walls all the time with no > > consequences. > > > > We don't know how's the recovery on the agility bar either. If it's good > > then it should cost bars...if it's crap then no. > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir > > <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > >> I used the run button all the time. > >> On 12 Jun 2014 16:38, "Donaldson, Alasdair" > >> <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Did you ever use the run button in MK3? I think I used it when > trolling > >>> with Cyrax and his grab into stuff, or with one of old SubZero’s > combos… > >>> not much else. > >>> > >>> It will be interesting seeing how this changes the oki game. > >>> > >>> I actually thought the movement in MK9 was fine. I mean for general > play > >>> between us (non Kabal/Kenshi matches). Felt smooth enough. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >>> *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir > >>> *Sent:* 12 June 2014 4:32 PM > >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes! > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> You can use bar for teleport stuff in kof. Most of it is last dich when > >>> I > >>> use it. > >>> > >>> On 12 Jun 2014 16:28, "Donaldson, Alasdair" < > >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> Don't you need meter for some of the movement stuff in KOF? I mean the > >>> rolls? > >>> Who knows how this is going to work? I presume the backdashing will be > >>> enough to clear the space and either give you the opportunity to whiff > >>> punish or set up some zoning stuff. > >>> This is MK... they've never had proper backdashes before. They're now > >>> adding new movement and people are still complaining that this will > >>> reduce > >>> their ability to play the game? How? > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >>> On Behalf Of Manase Zote > >>> Sent: 12 June 2014 4:22 PM > >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > >>> > >>> In other games we can backlash until the cows come home and there is no > >>> meter for that and the game is still fair nothing broken about the > >>> mechanic. lol In street fighter if you backdash non stop you corner > >>> yourself and that alone is bad so I still don't understand why you > would > >>> need meter in helping with your suicide(cornering yourself). > >>> My suggestion is just balance the back dash so that it's not OP(like in > >>> SF, KOF and other 2D fighters). > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > The "agility bar" backdash covers much more distance than that i > >>> > think. > >>> > Also, if we can just backdash nonstop and avoid normals and > >>> > strings...rushdown/pressure characters will have problem, because > >>> > they'll just backdash and avoid everything all the time. > >>> > > >>> > Unless they make backdashing more technical like Tekken. I think the > >>> > agility bar is fair. It doesn't limit anything at all. It helps with > >>> > tough situation. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> MK9 didn't have a bar for back dashing and it was just fine so what > >>> >> was wrong with that? > >>> >> > >>> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> >> > The movement and pace of the game seems to be the same as mk9 > >>> >> > (which i think is ok but not the best). The agility bar enhances > >>> >> > that a lot more for > >>> >> > 1-2 > >>> >> > bars. So i don't mind it. It doesn't limit the movement of game at > >>> all. > >>> >> > Eg. > >>> >> > Tekken movement but you can do a "super" backdash for 1 agility > bar > >>> >> > (that fills up on it's own pretty nicely) to get out of Nina's > df+1 > >>> >> > ss+1 pressure...or spend 2 agility bars to avoid nina's df+1 ss+1 > >>> >> > pressure by using stage interactables and jump away. Not sure if > >>> >> > you're invincible or not during the jump...What was injustice > like? > >>> >> > > >>> >> > So the basic movements is there. No limitation at all. Agility bar > >>> >> > helps but doesn't defy the whole movement gameplay. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> wrote: > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> At this point no one knows how all of the above system mechanics > >>> >> >> are going to turn out. > >>> >> >> Limiting movement to a bar is a crime in any fighting game > because > >>> >> >> you need movement for everything you do in a fighting game. > >>> >> >> It also affects the pacing of the overall match. So for me > >>> >> >> limiting movement to a bar is a gimmick and will only give > players > >>> >> >> more problems rather than assisting them in a match. > >>> >> >> I still don't see how styles can solve bad match ups, zoner will > >>> >> >> always have an advantage from range, rushdown owns up-close... > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> >> >> wrote: > >>> >> >> > There's an agility bar. New bar. Nothing to do with EX bar. It > >>> >> >> > fills up pretty quickly. There's 2 bar. You use 1 to perform > run > >>> >> >> > or a backdash (spaces out quite a bit). I think this is fair. > It > >>> >> >> > fills up fast enough to use it every now and then. But not > >>> >> >> > enough to just spam nonstop. You use > >>> >> >> > 2 to > >>> >> >> > use stage interactables. So it's not a stage interactablefest > >>> >> >> > like Injustice. You have to decide if it'll be worth it to use > >>> >> >> > interactables or to just dash up to continue pressure / dash > >>> >> >> > away to keep zoning. > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > As for variation. It's like saying Catwomen decides to do > >>> rushdown. > >>> >> >> > And > >>> >> >> > Grundy decides to do "zoning" with his zombie ground grab > thingy > >>> >> >> > (meaning he'll not have his armor chainthrows etc.) Catwomen > >>> >> >> > will just run up to grundy with her claw slash and ignore most > >>> >> >> > of Grundy's zoning. I'm hoping the character variation is NOT > >>> >> >> > going to be rock/paper/scissors. Hope it helps you with really > >>> >> >> > bad match up, but still at the end of the day...it's what you > >>> >> >> > do. Because in MK9, i can just spam Kabal's instant air > fireball > >>> >> >> > like a noob and know some combos and it'll already be hard to > >>> >> >> > win against kabal without having to learn his advance nomad > dash > >>> >> >> > cancels if you play someone who has trouble with zoning. > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > so instead of choosing a variation and giving you instant win > >>> >> >> > (because you only keep a few moveset between variations). i'm > >>> >> >> > hoping variation helps with really bad match ups like 9-1 or > 8-2 > >>> >> >> > to something like 6-4 or 5-5 and what not. because fighting > >>> >> >> > games should be about what you can do as a player. > >>> >> >> > just because i know stupid spamming basic kabal shouldn't give > >>> >> >> > me instant advantage over someone who's really good with > sheeva, > >>> >> >> > scorpion or sub zero (don't know which characters have issue > >>> >> >> > with zoning in mk9...) > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Manase Zote < > bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> >> >> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> SAP just told me that you need meter to run? > >>> >> >> >> Isn't that supposed to be stone age mechanics(having a meter > >>> >> >> >> for running)? > >>> >> >> >> Who said running was broken? > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> *Sigh* > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> Back in MK3/UMK3/MK4 that meter also managed your combos so no > >>> >> >> >> meter no chain combos no running around :( > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Wynand-Ben > >>> >> >> >> <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> >> >> >> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> > Im also not seeing how it can help bad matchups. > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> > Picking a different version of the same character or a > >>> >> >> >> > different character all together between matches would be > >>> >> >> >> > just like it was now. > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> > Counterpicking etc. > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:11:20 +0200 > >>> >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > >>> >> >> >> >> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx > >>> >> >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> How do you get around the rock/paper/scissors character > >>> >> >> >> >> selection? > >>> >> >> >> >> Player 1 picks his zoning scorpion while player 2 goes for > >>> >> >> >> >> rush down version of scorpion, it will still be a bad match > >>> >> >> >> >> up for one of the guys regardless. > >>> >> >> >> >> Tools of the characters, match-up exp and lastly the skill > >>> >> >> >> >> level and execution will be the deciding factor. > >>> >> >> >> >> To me the understanding of a balance fighting is to make > >>> >> >> >> >> every character the same... > >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Di Lhong < > numotd@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> >> >> >> >> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> > Hmmm a good fighting game shouldn't be all about bad > match > >>> >> >> >> >> > up and lack of knowledge...it should still be fun and > >>> >> >> >> >> > challenging in another level when your opponent knows > what > >>> >> >> >> >> > your character can do. > >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> > Yes there are bad match ups and character knowledge in > >>> >> >> >> >> > fighting games. > >>> >> >> >> >> > but > >>> >> >> >> >> > it shouldn't be in a state of "i know what you're doing, > >>> >> >> >> >> > but i can't retaliate at all" > >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> > Eg. Tekken. Capos. If my opponent knows how to deal with > >>> >> >> >> >> > relax stance and such. I'll play in another mode :) There > >>> >> >> >> >> > is no "instant" win in tekken. > >>> >> >> >> >> > you > >>> >> >> >> >> > can play bears and still win against top tier character > >>> >> >> >> >> > because you the player are just better. shouldn't be > >>> >> >> >> >> > bringing a plastic ruler to a gun fight situation. should > >>> >> >> >> >> > be more or less "experienced fighter with a slightly > blunt > >>> >> >> >> >> > knife" vs "an okay-ish fighter with a sharp knife". > >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Manase Zote > >>> >> >> >> >> > <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> This method of balancing looks like a throw of dice to > >>> >> >> >> >> >> me. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> It can go either way, you potentially have a scenario > >>> >> >> >> >> >> where you can lose a match based on lack of character > >>> >> >> >> >> >> knowledge rather than skill. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> If the game has like 30 characters for an example > >>> >> >> >> >> >> multiply that by 3 so on average you need to be aware of > >>> >> >> >> >> >> what all 90 variations are capable of? > >>> >> >> >> >> >> Let's wait and see what the move list looks like and how > >>> >> >> >> >> >> many moves will change between 3 variations of a > >>> >> >> >> >> >> character. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Di Lhong > >>> >> >> >> >> >> <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > 11.59? XD > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > Hopefully the character variation will be some answer > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > to really bad match up. Not sure how they'll balance > it > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > tho. It'll be weird to just be a total counter to > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > another characters variation completely. If that's the > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > case, it'll be more rock paper scissors situation than > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > a fighting game lolz hopefully the variations will > make > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > match ups like 9-1 to 6-4 or what not. So there'll > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > still be unfavourable match ups but not a complete > lose > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > like MK9...eg. Kabal vs Sheeva... > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Ryan Williams > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> I think 12:00 is a safer option Rich :) > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:24 PM, > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Is 11:30 fine also?? I wanna get game time as much > as > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I can Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> email find you! > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> ________________________________ > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Sender: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:15:48 +0200 > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> To: <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> ReplyTo: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Heya peeps, we'll be starting the Sat sessions at > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 12pm to maximise game time. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Anyone who is keen on starting a little earlier can > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> join us at that time. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> If you aren't able to make 12pm, that's fine as > well. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Ashraf Barendse > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> I think she feeling a bit lazy today. She was like > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> "Can I speak to the main owner of the computer" and > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> I was like "he's at work" > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> and > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> she > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> was > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> like > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> "k thanx bye" > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Nicholas > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> I love those. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Start talking linux, usually goes well. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "move to your start bar" > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "don't have one" > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "what version of Windows are you using" > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "I'm not using Windows" > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "Open up Internet Explorer" > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "don't have that either" > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "open your web browser" > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "mkay" > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "install this app" > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "using my regular tar.z loader or the synaptic > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> package manage?" > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "huh?" > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> good times. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Ashraf Barendse > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> lol, got a call from an Indian sounding lady > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> calling from "Windows Technical Department" > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> How about no. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Ryan Williams > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> "Can I just buy a complete game please?" > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Not going to happen in this day and age. Those > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> days are over. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Nicholas > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> LOL > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> I don't know which I hate more about fighting > >>> games. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> The > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> update > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> approach like Street Fighter, or the supposedly > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> new game like Blazblue and Persona. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> It makes me not want to buy the games anymore, > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> because there will be an Update later. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Can I just buy a complete game please? > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Do I need to buy another Persona now? > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Do I need to buy another Blazblue now? > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> I'm just ranting because I see there's a new > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> character coming out for P4A ...and I was > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> planning to get the new Blazblue (english > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> version)... > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> In all honesty, the Capcom approach makes more > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> sense to me, as much as I dislike it. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Wynand-Ben > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> A new dark age starting off with a new Guilty > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Gear I can definitely live with :D > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:59:23 +0200 > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > I'm all for the next FG dark age. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > Wreal wrap. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > On 12/06/2014, Ilitirit Sama > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > Mortal Kombat Honest Trailer: > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCiVYKmCveY > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > ============================================= > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > ============================ You are > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > Community mailing list. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > ========================================================= > >>> >> >> >> >> >> ================ You are subscribed to the Cape Town > >>> >> >> >> >> >> Fighting Game Community mailing list. > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc > >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> > ============================================================ > >>> >> >> >> >> ============= You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting > >>> >> >> >> >> Game Community mailing list. > >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > =============================================================== > >>> >> >> >> ========== You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game > >>> >> >> >> Community mailing list. > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > ================================================================== > >>> >> >> ======= You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game > >>> >> >> Community mailing list. > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > ===================================================================== > >>> >> ==== You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community > >>> >> mailing list. > >>> >> > >>> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > ========================================================================= > >>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing > >>> list. > >>> > >>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc > >>> > >>> ********************************************************************** > >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this > >>> e-mail > >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication > >>> in > >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," > send > >>> to > >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of > >>> it. > >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on > >>> it, > >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in > >>> this > >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the > >>> governing > >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other > >>> information > >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > >>> > >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or > >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, > >>> lost, > >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > >>> > >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing > >>> services > >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a > >>> Swiss > >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of > independent > >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a > legally > >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. > >>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG > >>> member > >>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. > >>> > >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > >>> AntiVirus software. > >>> > >>> ------------------------------ > >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this > >>> e-mail > >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication > >>> in > >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," > send > >>> to > >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of > >>> it. > >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on > >>> it, > >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in > >>> this > >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the > >>> governing > >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other > >>> information > >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > >>> > >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or > >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, > >>> lost, > >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > >>> > >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing > >>> services > >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a > Swiss > >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of > independent > >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a > legally > >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. > >>> Information > >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can > >>> be > >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. > >>> > >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > >>> AntiVirus software. > >>> > >> > > > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list. > > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >