[bookport] Re: Request: second headphone jack

  • From: "Russ & Valerie" <valruss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:15:39 -0400

The smaller the profile of the splitter, the less leverage there is when a cord is pulled.

Having a splitter that has a long throw and 2 long wires connecting to the earphone wires causes a large stresss on the receptacle.

Find a low profile splitter that has no wires.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Walt Smith" <walt@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, 27 April, 2006 18 14
Subject: [bookport] Re: Request: second headphone jack


Actually, I think that the physics of the thing would dictate that a
splitter that's nothing but a plug; as opposed to one with a couple of short
cords; would place more stress on the jack.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Angie Matney" <armatney@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 6:10 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Request: second headphone jack


My DVD player has a second headphone jack, but I don't think I would use one
on the BP. I have used a splitter--I find
the one with no cord is the best, because it doesn't add a lot of extra
weight that can cause problems with the jack.




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.1/327 - Release Date: 4/28/2006




Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. bookport
  3. Archive
  4. 04-2006