I know that network cables come with different ratings; perhaps USB ones = do as well. Maybe a lesson on cable lore might be in order here!! -----Original Message----- From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jerry Neufeld Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 10:28 PM To: bookport Subject: [bookport] Feeling a bit sheepish Playing with hardware for as long as I have, I should have guessed, I = should have known. Cables. About cables. Well, some just break, some perform intermittently, others are inappropriate. Recently, I have joined the = group of users of BookPort whose computers no longer recognize the device as = of the most recent version of the firmware. Only one of my six pc's saw the BookPort as it should. As it turned out, that one machine had its own u = s b cable, I having used another for the remaining five, a cable that has = worked flawlessly since I bought it. Well, it don't perform no good no more, = or, at least, not with the BookPort. When I moved to another cable, this one = said to be appropriate for u s b2 devices, all computers saw the b p without trouble. I must apologize to the a p h people for having added to their headaches. I always change my cables, just in the wholly improbable = event that they are the cause of a problem. Although I assume the BookPort to be a u s b1 device, the x p operating system does not identify them as such with my computers, all equipped = with the new, faster u s b2 ports. Does anyone at a p h or on this list know = if the u s b 1 versus 2 can be at issue here? The cable that has proved = faulty became so only as of implementation of the newest firmware, a tad coincidental in my view. Tomorrow, I will check the integrity of my seemingly faulty cable with a known u s b1 device working from a u s b1 port. Again, my apologies for having added to the headaches. Regards to everyone, Jerry