Along this same line, I wonder who is submitting all the Louis LaMour books that all seem to be rated good. I'm not about to validate them because I don't like that type of book. ----- Original Message ----- From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 12:48 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] submitter Adrienne Asch
I notice a number of newly submitted books by Adrienne Asch. They have the usual less than excellent rating attached to her submits.She uses Kurzweil.This kind of activity is just the kind of submitting which leads to long waits on step 1. The subjects are ones of ethical, moral or medical interest to a particular group. She has at least submitted in rtf. However, someone who has as good an education as she does and has the good tools available in Kurzweil and wants books of this nature validated is going to have a harder time if she submits poor quality work.Sorry if I am venting. I am concerned that her submits (and there have been many of them) display the kinds of characteristics which make them good candidates for long long waits on step 1 or for rejection.E. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxput the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.-- No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.1/805 - Release Date: 5/15/2007 10:47 AM
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
