[bksvol-discuss] relying in kes' ranked spelling
- From: Grandma Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
I'm validating a book now that looks very clean. I
suspect that if it was checked with kes ranked
spelling it would have gotten a very high ranking. But
reading it shows that there are many, many errors that
wouldn't be identified by the kes ranked spelling or
by Word's spell check--things like semicolons where
there should be commas and words like lie for like,
tune for time, polling for pulling, our for out, end
for and, and many more--and I'm only on page 18.
Just commenting. I know it's too much to expect
everyone who scans to read their books before
submission, and I suspect that validators who download
a book marked excellent will assume that it is and
possibly not read it, either--though I know many of
you do. But I think that is why some books that appear
excellent aren't really. Running kes ranked spelling
or Word's spell-check certainly would get rid of a lot
of junk and mis-spelled words, but it's not perfect.
Cindy
Cindy
____________________________________________________________________________________Get
the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing.
http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/index.php
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
Other related posts:
