Sue, I think those are good thoughts. It wouldn't take much time to actually read random pages here and there. Then if the submitter didn't want to read the book before submission, at least he or she could warn about the conditon, which some people do. I don't mind taking a book that I know might have a lot of errors or problems if I'm warned in advance or asked to take it, and I suspect there are others willing, too. smile Cindy --- siss52 <siss52@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Cindy, > > Since you are very thooughtfully speaking in > general, it does seem that > submitters could take random samples of their > scans--i.e., read a couple of > pages here and there to see if this problem exists. > After all, they make > more than we do. <smile> And if submitters find > that this problem exists > with a lot of their scans, maybe they coould get the > problem cleared up > before submitting anything else. Just my thoughts. > > Sue S. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Grandma Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:19 AM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] relying in kes' ranked > spelling > > > I'm validating a book now that looks very clean. I > suspect that if it was checked with kes ranked > spelling it would have gotten a very high ranking. > But > reading it shows that there are many, many errors > that > wouldn't be identified by the kes ranked spelling or > by Word's spell check--things like semicolons where > there should be commas and words like lie for like, > tune for time, polling for pulling, our for out, end > for and, and many more--and I'm only on page 18. > > Just commenting. I know it's too much to expect > everyone who scans to read their books before > submission, and I suspect that validators who > download > a book marked excellent will assume that it is and > possibly not read it, either--though I know many of > you do. But I think that is why some books that > appear > excellent aren't really. Running kes ranked spelling > or Word's spell-check certainly would get rid of a > lot > of junk and mis-spelled words, but it's not perfect. > > Cindy > > Cindy > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________Get > > the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email > wherever you're surfing. > http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/index.php > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject > line. To get a list of > available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in > the subject line. > > > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject > line. To get a list of available commands, put the > word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > > ____________________________________________________________________________________Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.