[bksvol-discuss] Re: page breaks
- From: "Evan Reese" <mentat1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:08:10 -0700
I don't see how such a requirement could be enforced. Theoretically, it would
be great if it were done on every book.
----- Original Message -----
From: k4zq
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 10:52 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: page breaks
Evan,
Just wondering; should validators be required to read through their books eh?
Might ensure better quality.
Ernie
----- Original Message -----
From: Evan Reese
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 4:47 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: page breaks
That's only if the page breaks are missing and you choose not to put them
in. Validators are not required to read through a book as you are doing. It
is perfectly legitimate for someone who doesn't choose to read through an
entire book for whatever reason that has - at least more than a few - missing
page breaks to reject it. But if you choose to add in any that are missing as
you read along, then by all means do so. It will get a book into the
collection that otherwise would not get in, or if it was passed by a minimalist
validator, one that was missing page breaks. So keep going, don't reject, if
you are willing to see it through to the end, putting in any missing page
breaks and fixing up anything else that is needful as you go along.
Good luck.
----- Original Message -----
From: Linda C. Knight
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 10:17 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: page breaks
Oh, no!
I have put 14 days in this book and I should reject it?
linda k.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.4/424 - Release Date: 8/21/2006
Other related posts:
