In general, it is a bad idea to use global replace to get rid of almost any junk character. In many books there are a few instances of square brackets or similar chars. I urge volunteers to avoid editing shortcuts like mass replacements of single chars, use simple repeated search for the junk chars and take appropriate action. In some cases this will be outright removal, in other cases you may need to replace the junk char with another valid character. Thanks, Guido Guido Dante Corona IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx. Research Division, Phone: 512. 838. 9735. Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx Web: http://www.ibm.com/able Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx> Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 04/04/2005 10:59 PM Please respond to bksvol-discuss To bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx cc Subject [bksvol-discuss] Re: brackets Sue, I agree. I was going to say the same thing. re your other post: I think in all the validations I've done there have rarely been brackets. That's why it's been o.k. for me to use a global replace to get rid of the ones that are are junk. I used them myself, though, when I described illustrations. No longer, however -- now I just use italics. Cindy > The way Guido explains things he would make a good > instructor.. > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Sign up for Fantasy Baseball. http://baseball.fantasysports.yahoo.com/