[bksvol-discuss] Re: Nuking Fair submissions
- From: Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 15:49:15 -0800 (PST)
Lisa,
I'm not an authority, but I don't see why not. The
suggestion has been made that books that need a lot of
work should be rejected and then rescanned, and that
books that don't have page breaks should be rejected
and rescanned. Certainly it shouldn't be done for the
purpose of denying one person credits and gaining
credit as a submitter for one's self, but as things
stand now, if txt files can't be given hard breaks, to
me it seems easier to convert them to rtf and submit
them than to re-scan them. Hopefully, though, the
bookshare engineers will find a way to allow txt files
to be uploaded as rtf files and then it won't be a
problem -- for they'll find a way to convert submitted
txt files to rtf before putting them on the download
list.
Cindy
--- Lisa Leonardi <lml5280@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Cindy,
>
> Is that okay to do? I've been wondering about
> rejecting some of the really
> poor txt files and resubmitting them in RTF. Is
> that allowed?
>
> Lisa
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 1:28 AM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Nuking Fair
> submissions
>
>
> > Ah! That's good, I guess, so her feelings won't be
> > hurt. But I did send my suggestion via a mutual
> > friend. However, if she doesn't do it I'll try.
> I'll
> > at least do one book, i.e., download it, convert
> to
> > rtf, reject the downloaded one and submit the rtf
> one.
> > I've never read a Harlequin or Silhouette book. I
> > might enjoy them, maybe alternating between those
> and
> > "heavier" or other books. In the past I've done
> two
> > books of popular authors of so-called romance
> books
> > and I thought they were written poorly, though
> they're
> > best sellers. But the plots kept me interested and
> > these can't be any worse.
> >
> > I'm slow but thorough. I'll just plod along and do
> the
> > best I can and hope people benefit. (smile)
> >
> > Cindy
> >
> >
> >
> > <kellhart@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Cindy,
> > > I don't believe that the submitter in question
> is on
> > > this list.
> > > Kellie
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Dress up your holiday email, Hollywood style.
> Learn more.
> > http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Other related posts:
