Lisa, nuking bad submissions and resubmitting better copies, especially in RTF, is not only allowed but actually encouraged. Go for it! Guido Guido Dante Corona IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx. Research Division, Phone: 512. 838. 9735. Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx Web: http://www.ibm.com/able "Lisa Leonardi" <lml5280@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 12/29/2004 12:25 PM Please respond to bksvol-discuss To <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject [bksvol-discuss] Re: Nuking Fair submissions Cindy, Is that okay to do? I've been wondering about rejecting some of the really poor txt files and resubmitting them in RTF. Is that allowed? Lisa ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 1:28 AM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Nuking Fair submissions > Ah! That's good, I guess, so her feelings won't be > hurt. But I did send my suggestion via a mutual > friend. However, if she doesn't do it I'll try. I'll > at least do one book, i.e., download it, convert to > rtf, reject the downloaded one and submit the rtf one. > I've never read a Harlequin or Silhouette book. I > might enjoy them, maybe alternating between those and > "heavier" or other books. In the past I've done two > books of popular authors of so-called romance books > and I thought they were written poorly, though they're > best sellers. But the plots kept me interested and > these can't be any worse. > > I'm slow but thorough. I'll just plod along and do the > best I can and hope people benefit. (smile) > > Cindy > > > > <kellhart@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Cindy, > > I don't believe that the submitter in question is on > > this list. > > Kellie > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Dress up your holiday email, Hollywood style. Learn more. > http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com > >