Thanks, Jill. No, I didn't understand that at all, so thank you for explaining. I've received the impression that it's auite expensive, so I assumed it was a scanner with an OCR program as part of it, like my Epson and its Fine Reader. I think my husband bought my second one for around $100, but I don't think the Fine Reader is as complete as it could be. It's functional enough for my purposes, but the one I had before did more pages at once; when I tried to find out more I was told my is a brief program and I'd have to be the one that does more. G.Cindy --- Jill O'Connell <jillocon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Cindy, In case you are a little confused, Kurzweil > is a program, not a > scanner. In fact, they (Kurzweil) have a list of > recommended scanners and > the Epson ones are at the top. However, the program > that comes with the > scanner doesn't give the blind user anywhere near > the features we get with > Kurzweil. If you already understood this, just > disregard the above. Jill > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Grandma Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 8:25 PM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: A Proposal For A > Quality Solution > > > > It doesn't matter how old or bad the scanner is if > the > > submitter proofreads it before submitting it. It > may > > be more work for the submitter, but otherwise it's > > more work for the validator and the submitter > > shouldn't get the same amount of monetary credit. > > > > Or the submitter can buy a new scanner. It doesn't > > have to be the wonderful but expensive K1000; it > can > > be an Epson, which varies in price depending on > the > > model, but I think some refurbished ones are less > than > > $100. I know money is tight, but expenses made for > > charitable purposes can be deducted, if you happen > to > > itemize. > > > > G.Cindy > > > > --- Bob <rwiley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> I don't think it's discrimination if the quality > >> requirement is applied no > >> matter which technology was used. If I read a > book > >> that is well scanned it > >> doesn't matter whether it was scanned by 1994 > >> technology or at 80 pages a > >> minute (I'm still boggled with that number). What > I > >> care about is, can I > >> read the book without having to do mental > guesswork > >> as I go. > >> > >> Bob > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Cindy Ray" <cindyray@xxxxxxxxx> > >> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 9:08 PM > >> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: A Proposal For A > >> Quality Solution > >> > >> > >> > Yeah, but didn't Jamie say that the "fair" > isn't > >> up there anymore? I > >> > haven't looked. So it would have to be "good", > and > >> I don't think > >> > "good" is "good" enough unless there is a > higher > >> standard for it than > >> > what I'e seen. > >> > > >> > As for older technology: I for one can sort of > see > >> the point. My old > >> > Ruby, though, has a lot of weird placement of > >> words. I would actually > >> > have to hire a reader to straighten out the > books > >> if I scanned books > >> > with it. This would not be an option. I don't > scan > >> with it these days, > >> > and maybe there was an update someplace along > the > >> line I did not get > >> > (it was 1994 vintage), but I can see the point > >> about the > >> > discrimination against those using older > >> technology. At the same time, > >> > though, not only are people expecting quality > from > >> Bookshare, they are > >> > paying for it. Though the price is not all that > >> high, it is still a > >> > price and deserves quality. And if someone is > >> having good luck with > >> > the older technology and producing quality > scans, > >> that's a good thing. > >> > I have no problem with using it. > >> > > >> > > >> > Cindy Lou Ray. Each day is a new adventure. > >> > > >> > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank > Email > >> to > >> > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the > >> subject line. To get a list > >> > of available commands, put the word 'help' by > >> itself in the subject line. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > No virus found in this incoming message. > >> > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: > 269.16.3/1144 - > >> Release Date: > >> > 11/21/2007 4:28 PM > >> > > >> > > >> > >> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email > to > >> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the > subject > >> line. To get a list of available commands, put > the > >> word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > > Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. > > Make Yahoo! your homepage. > > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email > to > > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the > subject line. To get a list > > of available commands, put the word 'help' by > itself in the subject line. > > > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG. > > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.4/1147 - > Release Date: > > 11/23/2007 9:19 AM > > > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject > line. To get a list of available commands, put the > word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.