[beports] Re: deleting information (WAS Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h)
- From: Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@xxxxxx>
- To: beports@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 00:22:11 +0200
Am 27.05.2008 um 00:10 schrieb Ingo Weinhold:
On 2008-05-26 at 23:00:26 [+0200], Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@xxxxxx
>
wrote:
libiconv [...] [Ingo, if you're reading this, please have a look at
config.sub,
doesn't look correct to me?].
Not sure what you mean. What do you think is wrong with config.sub?
In one of the files in the libiconv patch (I thought it was in
config.sub) there was a list of operating system expressions, such
as ... | -beos* | ... whereas Haiku was listed as ... | -beos* |
haiku* | ... without the dash. No idea if it has any significance but
it caught my eye that it was the only one without dash.
Andreas
--
BePorts homepage - http://tools.assembla.com/BePorts
List archives: http://www.freelists.org/archives/beports
Administrative contact: brecht@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [beports] [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h
- From: Andreas Färber
- [beports] Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h
- From: Andreas Färber
- [beports] deleting information (WAS Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h)
- From: Brecht Machiels
- [beports] Re: deleting information (WAS Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h)
- From: Andreas Färber
- [beports] Re: deleting information (WAS Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h)
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [beports] deleting information (WAS Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h)
- » [beports] Re: deleting information (WAS Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h)
- » [beports] Re: deleting information (WAS Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h)
- » [beports] Re: deleting information (WAS Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h)
- » [beports] Re: deleting information (WAS Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h)
- » [beports] Re: deleting information (WAS Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h)
- » [beports] Re: deleting information (WAS Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h)
- » [beports] Re: deleting information (WAS Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h)
- » [beports] Re: deleting information (WAS Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h)
wrote:
libiconv [...] [Ingo, if you're reading this, please have a look at config.sub,doesn't look correct to me?].
Not sure what you mean. What do you think is wrong with config.sub?
- [beports] [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h
- From: Andreas Färber
- [beports] Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h
- From: Andreas Färber
- [beports] deleting information (WAS Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h)
- From: Brecht Machiels
- [beports] Re: deleting information (WAS Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h)
- From: Andreas Färber
- [beports] Re: deleting information (WAS Re: [RFC] Patch for gnulib's stdbool.h)
- From: Ingo Weinhold