[AZ-Observing] Re: Instant criminals
- From: "Joseph R. Goss" <apachejo@xxxxxxx>
- To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:50:45 -0700
Thad
I object to your use of " average Joes"
Joe Goss
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thad Robosson" <starstarcracker@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 07:48
Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Instant criminals
>
> Headline on the Drudge Report.....
>
> http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050105/D87DMD880.html
>
>
> If the lawyer were smart, she would provide evidence of a handheld
> laser's weakness, and the difficulty in pointing it that accurately.
> Not to
> mention that at an altittude of 3000 ft, how much farther one would have
> to
> be to actually get it into the windshield. (4200 ft for a 45* angle) I
> really
> hope that these laywers do their homework and get this guy off based on
> the
> technical issues. Then the precedent that these lasers are (somewhat)
> harmless
> would be set, and hopefully no more hard lessons learned by "average
> Joes".
>
> But on the other hand....the pilots claim the laser came into the cockpit
> 3 times....you really have to try to achieve that. In short, 3 times =
> no accident.
>
>
> DISCLAIMER....I have not spoketh of any political
> affliction/affiliation/leanings.
> Any conclusions that an individual may draw from the above statements
> are purely
> their own and indeed such conclusions are purely speculative. In such
> circumstances,
> please delete the message and forget it was ever written.
> --
> See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
> send personal replies to the author, not the list.
>
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
Other related posts:
