atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- From: MHT <runfox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:28:51 -0600
My first choice as well - despite the considerable variations that can be
(and were) pointed out in any host of sources on the WWW, including
"professional" sources. But thank you for your input as well as the kind
reminder to get a brain.
MHT a.k.a The Scarecrow
On 1/14/2008 2:59:41 PM, austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> This is a total n0-brainer. The third list is correct.
>
> Matthew da Silva
> The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:austechwriter-
> bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of MHT
> Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2008 6:44 AM
> To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: atw: in's or ins' or ins
>
>
> Greeting all,
> Which is correct (non-possessive):
>
> Check-up's
> Check-in's
> Built-in's
> Plug-in's
> Drop-in's
> Punch-in's
> or
> Check-ups'
> Check-ins'
> Built-ins'
> Plug-ins'
> Drop-ins'
> Punch-ins'
> or
> Check-ups
> Check-ins
> Built-ins
> Plug-ins
> Drop-ins
> Punch-ins
>
> Kind Regards,
> MHT
- Follow-Ups:
- atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- From: Matthew da Silva
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- From: Matthew da Silva