atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- From: MHT <runfox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:38:43 -0600
Snap!
At 04:22 PM 1/14/2008, you wrote:
Ugly American.. wtf?
----------
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:58:19 -0600
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: runfox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
<mailto:bog4n@xxxxxxxxxxx>bog4n@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thank you for your well thought out response and once again providing
fodder for the term "Ugly American".
I am ever so delighted to have given you the opportunity to flaunt you
obvious superiority, as well as your charming and winsome command of
clever WWW acronyms. As to who does not merit the sweat off my Lilly
White?well bog4?use your limited imagination, ROFL.
MHT
At 03:30 PM 1/14/2008, you wrote:
OMG!!!
Are you really a technical writer? That's got to be the dumbest question
ever asked in this forum ...I'm embarressed for you!
BOG4N
----------
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[<mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of MHT
Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2008 6:44 AM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: in's or ins' or ins
Greeting all,
Which is correct (non-possessive):
Check-up's
Check-in's
Built-in's
Plug-in's
Drop-in's
Punch-in's
or
Check-ups'
Check-ins'
Built-ins'
Plug-ins'
Drop-ins'
Punch-ins'
or
Check-ups
Check-ins
Built-ins
Plug-ins
Drop-ins
Punch-ins
Kind Regards,
MHT
----------
Check our comprehensive Salary Centre Overpaid or Underpaid?
----------
Join Lavalife for free. What are you waiting for?
- References:
- atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- From: Nigel D
- atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- From: MHT
- atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- From: BOG4N
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
Ugly American.. wtf? ---------- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:58:19 -0600 To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx From: runfox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins <mailto:bog4n@xxxxxxxxxxx>bog4n@xxxxxxxxxxxThank you for your well thought out response and once again providing fodder for the term "Ugly American". I am ever so delighted to have given you the opportunity to flaunt you obvious superiority, as well as your charming and winsome command of clever WWW acronyms. As to who does not merit the sweat off my Lilly White?well bog4?use your limited imagination, ROFL.
MHT At 03:30 PM 1/14/2008, you wrote: OMG!!!Are you really a technical writer? That's got to be the dumbest question ever asked in this forum ...I'm embarressed for you!
BOG4N ----------From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [<mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of MHT
Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2008 6:44 AM To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: atw: in's or ins' or ins Greeting all, Which is correct (non-possessive): Check-up's Check-in's Built-in's Plug-in's Drop-in's Punch-in's or Check-ups' Check-ins' Built-ins' Plug-ins' Drop-ins' Punch-ins' or Check-ups Check-ins Built-ins Plug-ins Drop-ins Punch-ins Kind Regards, MHT ---------- Check our comprehensive Salary Centre Overpaid or Underpaid? ---------- Join Lavalife for free. What are you waiting for?
- atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- From: Nigel D
- atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- From: MHT
- atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- From: BOG4N