Snap! At 04:22 PM 1/14/2008, you wrote:
Ugly American.. wtf? ---------- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:58:19 -0600 To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx From: runfox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins <mailto:bog4n@xxxxxxxxxxx>bog4n@xxxxxxxxxxxThank you for your well thought out response and once again providing fodder for the term "Ugly American". I am ever so delighted to have given you the opportunity to flaunt you obvious superiority, as well as your charming and winsome command of clever WWW acronyms. As to who does not merit the sweat off my Lilly White?well bog4?use your limited imagination, ROFL.MHT At 03:30 PM 1/14/2008, you wrote: OMG!!!Are you really a technical writer? That's got to be the dumbest question ever asked in this forum ...I'm embarressed for you!BOG4N ----------From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [<mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of MHTSent: Tuesday, 15 January 2008 6:44 AM To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: atw: in's or ins' or ins Greeting all, Which is correct (non-possessive): Check-up's Check-in's Built-in's Plug-in's Drop-in's Punch-in's or Check-ups' Check-ins' Built-ins' Plug-ins' Drop-ins' Punch-ins' or Check-ups Check-ins Built-ins Plug-ins Drop-ins Punch-ins Kind Regards, MHT ---------- Check our comprehensive Salary Centre Overpaid or Underpaid? ---------- Join Lavalife for free. What are you waiting for?