atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- From: "Matthew da Silva" <mdasilva@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:00:24 +1100
MHT - there are good reference works that provide everything you need,
such as:
* the Australian Government Style Manual for Authors, Editors
and Printers;
* the Cambridge Australian English Style Guide; and
Technical (eg web development) info online may be reliable. But an
individual can rise even to senior management without the requisite
grammatical skills for tech writing.
Matthew
________________________________
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of MHT
Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2008 8:41 AM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
Also a "total no-brainer" (or is that n0-brainer) yet oddly enough, the
point was lost on my audience.
MHT a.k.a The Scarecrow
On 1/14/2008 3:31:24 PM, austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Pls remember that 95 of everything that appears online is at least
> questionable, if not suspect.
>
> Matthew
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>
>
> From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:austechwriter-
> bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of MHT
> Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2008 8:29 AM
> To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
>
>
> My first choice as well - despite the considerable variations that can
be
> (and were) pointed out in any host of sources on the WWW, including
> "professional" sources. But thank you for your input as well as the
kind
> reminder to get a brain.
> MHT a.k.a The Scarecrow
>
> On 1/14/2008 2:59:41 PM, austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > This is a total n0-brainer. The third list is correct.
> >
> > Matthew da Silva
> > The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006
> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>
> >
> >
> > From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:austechwriter
[link:
> mailto:austechwriter]-
> > bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of MHT
> > Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2008 6:44 AM
> > To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: atw: in
- References:
- atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- From: MHT
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- » atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- atw: Re: in's or ins' or ins
- From: MHT