I tend to answer questions like this with comments along the lines "since you have refused to provide any training related to my previous suggestions over the last ... years, I refuse to waste further time answering this question..." But more constructively, you should go and find the SMEs and other stakeholders you work with, then ask them what they have been trained in (including conferences) at the company's expense over the last three years (you will probably be unpleasantly surprised at how little is spent on technical people these days). Collate this and create a monetary figure that you arm your review interview with. At the point when the training question arises, confront them with the numbers you were provided, then suggest some training relevant to you that is commensurate to the amounts you collated. At that point you suggest an increase in your salary to reflect that as long as you make the commitment to arrange and successfully complete the training yourself. That will present an indication about how really interested your manager is about "retaining" you and "developing" you. Make sure your resume is up to date at that point so that when they refuse; you leave when convenient to you and hopefully, most inconvenient to them. Best signal to anyone. Do unto them before they do unto you. Oh, and let everyone know out here why you left... But you also have to remember that because technical writers are usually lone rangers, and we use obscure skills; from an accounting viewpoint we rarely receive appropriate training because there is no "real benefit" or "economy of scale" quantifiable when one person receives training in a corporation. The training side of big businesses focusses on generalised soft skills - "leadership" and "management" training or other so-called guff and garbage like Health and Safety training. At the end of the day, as a technical writer, you need to accept that training will always be your responsibility and you have to negotiate that into your salary packages or your contract rates. Much of it is some form of tax deduction and degree courses such as I am doing are easily accessible on-line in your own time. So are conferences, and again, you have to negotiate that into your packages. Warren. On 29/08/2012, at 11:52 AM, Howard Silcock wrote: > Another option would be to focus on the 'experience' part of the question and > put 'the experience of having my suggestions taken seriously'. > Howard > > > > On 28 August 2012 19:23, Terry Dowling <Terrence.Dowling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > We’re in the process of scheduling performance appraisals, with one of the > standard questions asking “what training/experience would help you and the > company?”. As none of the training I’ve suggested in previous years has come > to fruition, and my colleagues are similarly affected, I’m thinking we > include a suggestion of “Training on how to accept the non-provision of > training” What do you reckon? We could genericise it to something like > “humility training”. > >