But the point is, Matthew, you gave us nothing more than a quotation from "a researcher". No name, no qualifications, no reference to any peer-reviewed publication. For all we knew, you could have been quoting a wheat farmer from the Wimmera who does a spot of market research on a Saturday afternoon at the Quambatook Sale Yards ... and for all we now know you are quoting someone who apparently has a doctorate and does research of some kind. Maybe what she said is true, but it helps no one assess the quality of what she has said if we are given no clues about the quality of her research. As for the quality of the doctor's language, you did her no favours by quoting her in full when a judicious ellipsis could, without robbing the meaning, have hidden the infelicities. While clarity of writing (and speech) doesn't necessarily indicate clarity of mind, muddled writing (and speech) certainly does suggest a muddled mind. And muddled it certainly was. It pays to sift the knowledge from all the so-called information flooding through cyberspace. Cheers Geoffrey Marnell Principal Consultant Abelard Consulting Pty Ltd T: +61 3 9596 3456 F: +61 3 9596 3625 W: <http://www.abelard.com.au/> www.abelard.com.au _____ From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matthew da Silva Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 10:46 PM To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: atw: Re: Blogging and employers Geoffrey, I think it makes a difference to remember that this was a spoken conversation and people are less thoughtful when speaking, than when writing. I imagine Dr Anderson would be more careful about her grammar if she were asked questions by email. We spoke on the phone for about 15 minutes. Extra cheers, Matthew da Silva BA (Hons) MMediaPrac m 0434 536 772 | e <mailto:mddasilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> mddasilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx w <http://www.matthewdasilva.com/> matthewdasilva.com From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Geoffrey Marnell Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 9:41 PM To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: atw: Re: Blogging and employers But Matthew, what does this really mean? It reads like post-modernist, everything-gores drivel: a series of conceptually fractured clauses-aka non sequiturs-starting down one alley, ending down another. "As a researcher in the area...": Que? "As a wheat farmer in the Wimmera, I reckon that string theory is a bit of multi-universal nonsense. Well, good on you. This is one of the many problems with the anyone-can-be-an-expert (aka Wikipedia-based) blogosphere. Who really gives a rats what Dr Donelittle from Quambatook thinks? Cheers-less Geoffrey Marnell Principal Consultant Abelard Consulting Pty Ltd T: +61 3 9596 3456 F: +61 3 9596 3625 W: <http://www.abelard.com.au/> www.abelard.com.au _____ From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matthew da Silva Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 8:34 PM To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: atw: Re: Blogging and employers Quote: "As a researcher in the area, my reading of that sort of negativity is more to do with intergenerational issues and the fact that, in our current climate, I think a lot of times the use of some of these newer media tools, like social networking sites, is seen as so much in the domain of a younger generation. There's a confounding of the situation because I don't think intergenerational challenges are new, nor has our human response to new technology been something new. It's been with us for a long time, as well." Matthew da Silva BA (Hons) MMediaPrac m 0434 536 772 | e mddasilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx w matthewdasilva.com <http://www.matthewdasilva.com/> From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stuart Burnfield Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 8:32 PM To: Austechwriter Subject: atw: Re: Blogging and employers Grr! That should be: "I'm not sure what you *mean* by this..." Stuart ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stuart Burnfield" <slb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Austechwriter" <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, 3 June, 2009 5:56:01 PM GMT +08:00 Perth Subject: Re: Blogging and employers Hi Matthew - > I spoke to a researcher recently who said that many of > the 'issues' experienced with new apps, such as those > grouped under the rubric 'Web 2.0', are intergenerational. I'm not sure what you many by this (many of the issues are intergenerational). Could you explain? Stuart