Gerhard Fuernkranz wrote:
Interesting. Obviously, the volumes differ less than 1% for the resolutions you tested - IMO that's not really much. I'm surprised that even the lower resolutions (i.e. larger -d...) agree so well.
Yes, the gamut surface representation is not an exact process, but is approximate due to the use of sampling, and the limited scope to follow convex surface shapes. If it were accurate within 1% I'd be very pleased (I doubt it is in many cases). Graeme Gill.
