[argyllcms] Re: another X error
- From: Stefan Döhla <color@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:36:37 +0200
Graeme,
Graeme Gill schrieb:
Frédéric wrote:
prudent, and these kind of restriction should not be a problem. More
and more people are using dual-screen config, and as ATI/NVidia are
the last video cards manufacturers, MergedFB/TwinView configs will be
more and more common.
I think it is really unfortunate that NVidia/ATI have been sloppy
and uncaring of the requirements of users needing color accurate
display on X11. It is not aiding the adoption of Linux/X11 when
display calibration is broken for users who adopt these manufacturers
solutions. If users want full acceleration for multi-screen and color
calibration, they will basically be forced to switch to OSX or MSWindows.
Did you already look into the fglrx API? This seems to be ATI's API for
accessing the LUT with their own (closed-source) drivers (which don't
work with the default XVidMode-Ext). I do personally only own an NVidia
card but implemented the API for xcalib on a user's request. It looks
like being some mixture of their Win32 stuff and XVidMode-Ext. At least
one can access all ATI cards by some kind of index - but don't know how
flexible it really is.
The bad thing about it is: I don't know whether one can detect the
accelerated fglrx driver with a normal application easily.
Stefan
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- From: Frédéric
- [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- From: Graeme Gill
- References:
- [argyllcms] X error under AMD64 arch
- From: Mickael Profeta
- [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- From: Frédéric
- [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- From: Frédéric
- [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- From: Graeme Gill
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- » [argyllcms] Re: another X error
prudent, and these kind of restriction should not be a problem. More and more people are using dual-screen config, and as ATI/NVidia are the last video cards manufacturers, MergedFB/TwinView configs will be more and more common.
I think it is really unfortunate that NVidia/ATI have been sloppy and uncaring of the requirements of users needing color accurate display on X11. It is not aiding the adoption of Linux/X11 when display calibration is broken for users who adopt these manufacturers solutions. If users want full acceleration for multi-screen and color calibration, they will basically be forced to switch to OSX or MSWindows.
- [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- From: Frédéric
- [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] X error under AMD64 arch
- From: Mickael Profeta
- [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- From: Frédéric
- [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- From: Frédéric
- [argyllcms] Re: another X error
- From: Graeme Gill