I have tried to use the filter in the past, however after making the adjustments to the settings there is a box that says something like filter and adjust now that does not highlight so I can select it. I am not sure if this feature is working..We have 04 Pro Plus. Herb ----- Original Message ----- From: "E. Orantes" <e3m@xxxxxxx> To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 8:14 AM Subject: [amayausers] Re: Puckering > Ron, > Pro plus has a feature called "proximity stitch filter/plotter" that will > look a design, say three identical fills on top of one another, and show > you > using different colors where too many stitches have been placed over one > another. From there you can run it through a filter that will actually > "offset" these stacked stitches by a distance/measurement you choose so > they > aren't "stacked" which would lead to potential thread breaks. It doesn't > remove stitches, simply moves the stitches. > Can't say I've ever used it before but here would be a good place to try > it > if I do the trick you just described and the software didn't compensate > automatically. Keep in mind, this is a Pro or Pro Plus feature. > > Ed > > -----Original Message----- > From: amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Body Cover > Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 10:41 AM > To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [amayausers] Re: Puckering > > > I read a great article in Stitches magazine > by Lee Carrosseli (sp?) one of the owners > of Balboa thread works. These guys are great digitizers > winners of many, many awards. Anyway... > > She suggest this for keeping fill stitches from pushing > to much and missing the registration of outlines. This also > keeps the puckering down. > (I am working from memory here, but you'll get the point) > the trick she showed was to take your normal fill > reduce the density you would normally use to 1/3 of the > original. then you duplicate the fill three times each time > changing the direction of the "in" and "out" so that it starts > from the opposite end of where the underneath fill. > (if the first starts on the left and ends on the right, then the next fill > would start on the right and end on the left) > apparently she states that most new digitizing programs won't > put the fill stitches in the exact same spot as the one underneath > so in effect you get better coverage with the same amount of stitches > and more fabric is covered. > I've used this technique with simple fills with only 2 layers > and it amazes me as to how much less push and pull I get. > Give it a try on some sample things and see if it doesn't work for you > too, > > Good Luck, > Ron Vinyard > Body Cover / Magic Stitches > www.bodycoverdesign.com > > Grants Pass, Oregon > 1-888-435-0716 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Veena Viswanath" <irisembroidery@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:24 AM > Subject: [amayausers] Re: Puckering > > >> Try reducing the density of the fill and use underlay before the fill. >> >> Maybe experts in digitizing may give you more info. >> >> >> Best Regards, >> Veena. >> >> Iris Embroidery, >> (510)-226-6171 >> irisembroidery@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Garber >> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 7:19 AM >> To: amayausers list >> Subject: [amayausers] Puckering >> >> Morning, >> >> Does anyone have any tricks to stop puckering on shirts? >> >> I'm sewing a left chest design that is about 2x4" and solid filled with a >> double satin trim. >> I'm using 15cm plastic hoops and have tried double 2oz backing, wrapping >> the >> hoops, tissue paper topping and different tension on the hoop. >> When I sew it on dress shirts and more resently a poplin jacket with a >> light >> lining I get puckering around the edges. >> Some customers wouldn't care, but this client is very picky about >> puckering. >> >> Also, the tech is coming up today to look at the machine that went up in >> smoke. I'll e-mail the results tomorrow. >> >> Mike >> >> >> >> >> > > > >