[xmlspif] Re: Hierarchic categories

  • From: Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: xmlspif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:04:09 -0700

On Mar 31, 2010, at 1:40 AM, Piers Chivers wrote:

> Hmmm.  Interesting.  This is not my impression of the use of hierarchy.
> Having re-read SDN.801 I can see it isn't clear what the purpose of
> hierarchy is. [Having said that, I've yet to meet anything that is clear
> in SDN.801  :) ]
> 
> With your approach, how do I know if a label with classification value
> of 27 dominates (or not) a label with classification value of 5?

In the SDN.801 (and AC 322) approach provides no label domination function.

> 
> Leaving classifications aside, I can still see a reason for hierarchy
> attribute on categories.  If I have a hierarchic category named "Impact"
> with values "HIGH", "NORMAL" and "LOW" how do I present these to the
> user appropriately?  Do we sya that "convention" is that they are
> presented in the order in which they are listed in the SPIF?

The presented order certainly impacts display markings and, I would say, also 
impacts UI ordering.

> I prefer formality to convention.  NB I'm only proposing this as an
> optional attribute.
> 
> Regards,
> Piers
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xmlspif-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xmlspif-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Kurt Zeilenga
> Sent: 30 March 2010 17:16
> To: xmlspif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [xmlspif] Re: Hierarchic categories
> 
> 
> On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Piers Chivers wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> We are meeting requirements where there is a need for more than one
> hierarchic list of values in a "label".
>> 
>> As a solution to this would it be possible to add an "hierarchy"
> attribute to the tagCategory element that has the same meaning as the
> hierarchy attribute of the securityClassification element?
> 
> Note that classification hierarchy in SPIFs is only for display purposes
> (ordering of classifications in UI menus and such).  It should not used
> in evaluation of the ACDF.
> 
> -- Kurt
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Classification added by SAFEmail - Labelling, Protective Marking and
> Release Control for Secure Messaging from Boldon James -
> www.boldonjames.com/safemail-ics
> 


Other related posts: