... and I think the important point is that people have more choices. If they want to be in groups with different approaches, they can have more variety. If all groups tried to be the same, it would be far worse. You're right that we are boring sometimes. We're also a little quiet. But I would take that any day over the kind of thing that goes on in Analytic. If we had the same 7 people there, over here, doing the same thing they do in the several groups they populate, it would just be ridiculous. But if I do have one honest regret, it is that I've never had enough "horses" in the group. I've never really had any Wittgenstein scholars in here. But at least I am fairly proud of one thing. I enjoy the subject list in our archives. If you look at the titles of the last 50 threads, they are pretty good for one who is interested in Wittgenstein. And so, I think the news or magazine format is better right now. If you want Wittgenstein news and developments, we have it. And if you want to talk about it, we can have that too -- but not as blood thirsts or endless telephone conversations between 3 people. Regards and thanks. Dr. Sean Wilson, Esq. [spoiler]Assistant Professor Wright State University Personal Website: http://seanwilson.org SSRN papers: http://tinyurl.com/3eatnrx Wittgenstein Discussion: http://seanwilson.org/wiki/doku.php?id=wittrs [/spoiler] ----- Original Message ----- From: Han Geurdes <han.geurdes@xxxxxxxxx> To: wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 10:13 PM Subject: Re: [Wittrs] As Analytic Turns Dear Sean, I think your approach helps to keep wittrs alive. It is a bit dull every now and then but you did mention two very good refrences to LW's work. I especially like the reference to the annotated Tractatus. I must admit I still do understand little of it but it keeps me busy thinking about what Wittgenstein was trying to say. That is the fun of it. Best, Han On 21 July 2011 03:43, kirby urner <kirby.urner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hah, I don't read Analytic. Fun to hear about dogs though > as I do quite a bit with dogs, e.g. in the "mechanized logic" > class that I teach (Lesson 14, Project 1 for example: > all about a Dog class, with attributes name and breed). > > I'm fine tuning a brand of linguistic turn philosophy that > is especially skeptical of English, yet is written in English, > or some say it is. Others claim there's a language > called Amerish, and this is what the buckaneers are > using for their treasure maps (geocached mail drops > or whatever). > > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/edu-sig/2011-July/010407.html > > (scroll to end for Amerish reference, with link to poet > Gene Fowler: "But the speakers of Amerish > > (American-English, circa 2050 or so) will think > > faster, want more subtle words...maybe.") > > Kirby > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://undergroundwiki.org/pipermail/wittrs_undergroundwiki.org/attachments/20110720/062f3b73/attachment.html > > > _______________________________________________ > Wittrs mailing list > Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://undergroundwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/wittrs_undergroundwiki.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://undergroundwiki.org/pipermail/wittrs_undergroundwiki.org/attachments/20110721/075fcb72/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Wittrs mailing list Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://undergroundwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/wittrs_undergroundwiki.org _______________________________________________ Wittrs mailing list Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://undergroundwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/wittrs_undergroundwiki.org