--- On Sat, 4/3/10, SWM <wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Moreover, I will say again: It is no argument against a > view to attack its motivation(s) I think it adds light to understand the motivations for a particular point of view. And I repeat: eliminative materialism seems to me motivated by a fear of Cartesian dualism, naively understood. The eliminative materialist fails to understand that after one truly abandons the Cartesian mind/matter dichotomy, one can then a la Searle assign properties of mind to matter without transgressing reason. The eliminativist correctly abandons the unwanted Cartesian concept of non-physical mind but then he mistakenly holds onto the false Cartesian idea of matter, which on the dualist view can have no subjective aspect, i.e., no irreducible first-person ontology. The eliminativist doubles his mistake when he, a la Dennett, falsely labels those don't fall into the same trap "Cartesians". -gts ========================================== Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/