... just a short comment here. Have you noticed that one of the things that is striking about the Tractatus is that it does to metaphysics what the Investigations do to theories? That is, just as the Investigations present a sort of end-theory (as I have described it), the Tractatus presents a sort of end-metaphysic. I mean, we all know that the Tractatus is as metaphysical as anything can be. But what it really seems to do is PRESCRIBE THE CORRECT METAPHYSICS. What it purports to do is tell one to stop engaging in certain kinds of metaphysical indulgences and to simply adopt the conceptions of world (a rich conception of "groups" and "shuffle," as CJ has prior noted), will, visual field, language as a depiction -- all under the rubric of a logical system. And, as I have said, to keep certain devout indulgences in a kind of purgatory. Importantly, if this is not done, the other views are "proven" to be incorrect. The work indulges metaphysics to cleanse it and do away with anything other than the way of the end-metaphysic. And so what Wittgenstein does in the Tractatus is present the LAST METAPHYSIC. The only right way to do metaphysics. I mean, the fact that logic is wrapped up and presented through the medium of connected, numbered and gnomic utterances (like Tolstoy's Gospel in Brief) is completely ingenious. It is as if Moses were to come and to settle all matters regarding logic. To say that Wittgenstein contradicts himself is to say that one has a small mind. To say, instead, that he is rich is only to say that you have just entered in the matter. Yours amazed. Dr. Sean Wilson, Esq. Assistant Professor Wright State University Personal Website: http://seanwilson.org SSRN papers: http://ssrn.com/author=596860 Discussion Group: http://seanwilson.org/wittgenstein.discussion.html ========================================= Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/