[C] [Wittrs] Re: Essences versus Framework
- From: Sean Wilson <whoooo26505@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:34:56 -0800 (PST)
(J)
1. I can't accept "chairman," because that introduces polysemy into the
picture, which does nothing but cause a traffic accident. And I can't accept
doll chairs, because they are indeed beholden to the searing framework and
amount to a prejudice against little people. The picture of a chair is
interesting, but it, too, seems amenable to the seating framework. So does a
chair made of nails.
However, considering your views has made me discover a counter-example. Bloody
lounge chairs!
http://keetsa.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/lounge-chair.jpg
If logic is hell, language is a bitch.
Dr. Sean Wilson, Esq.
Assistant Professor
Wright State University
Personal Website: http://seanwilson.org
SSRN papers: http://ssrn.com/author=596860
Discussion Group: http://seanwilson.org/wittgenstein.discussion.html
=========================================
Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/
Other related posts:
