As to the notion of "form of life" and the relation of "form of life" to "language games", I believe that we are still operating while seeking to ignore the puzzle which remains as to just how "form of life" relates to "language game" other than as some amorphous "backdrop".. ..There is much more to this issue and to the far from automatic manner in which  a variety of "language games" arise from each of a variety of distinct 'forms of life".  The issue has to do with the manner in which "rules" or 'operations" are adopted by the participants. ..as the "language game " is shaped.  Moreover, the kind of "therapeutic" becoming familiar with the grammar of how we speak that Wittgenstein gives us is a crucial tool in our society coming to terms with how a form of life might give rise to one or another "language game" , with one or another set of rules and operations behind it.CJ" <wittrsamr@freelists  Wrote

sekhar   writesFor the means of knowledge to operate, it requires the notion of a
doer, and the notion of a doer is the result of superimposition on the
unattached brain. In other words, as soon as one falsely identifies the self as
a mind, i.e. an agent, or doer, then all fields that operate are in the field
of ignorance. Science, means of knowledge etc, since they require a distinct
doer, are therefore bound in the field of ignorance.
Data collected from various senses like eyes,touch,taste,smell and ears are all different and transitory in nature hence verbal sound is giving confirmation and certainty for them.In association with the sense data, knowledge is functioning so it appears to be a intrinsic organic whole.Here our LW come across and suggests a therapeutic value for the philosophical investigations.This what I could understand,You may suggest me if you feel I am wrong.
thank yousekhar                                           

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo.com/