[Wittrs] Re: Russell or Wittgenstein?
- From: brendan downs <downs_brendan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:36:42 +1200
<h96nko+oe6u@xxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
--_38158a96-5f21-4c08-89e0-2793c7adaebd_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Russell makes a pragmatic contradiction=2C 1. he disagrees and thinks W co=
nclusion is absurd and then he goes on to "Russell who bemoaned his own los=
s of intellectual powers". I think this can only be explained in a freudian=
sense. The work of PI is an extentsion of Augustines system to the point o=
f showing us what is involved in pointing. His fresh approach is his style =
which seems basic i.e. he uses basic words and basic examples to teach or s=
how. I apolgise if I don't understand the new way and was hoping you can el=
aborate for me.
=20
Brendan
=20
> Date: Mon=2C 21 Sep 2009 02:15:52 +0000
> From: SWMirsky@xxxxxxx=20
> To: wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Wittrs] Re: Russell or Wittgenstein?
>=20
> --- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=2C brendan downs <wittrs@...> wrote:
> >
> >=20
=
--_38158a96-5f21-4c08-89e0-2793c7adaebd_--
WEB VIEW: http://tinyurl.com/ku7ga4
TODAY: http://alturl.com/whcf
3 DAYS: http://alturl.com/d9vz
1 WEEK: http://alturl.com/yeza
GOOGLE: http://groups.google.com/group/Wittrs
YAHOO: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wittrs/
FREELIST: //www.freelists.org/archive/wittrs/09-2009
Other related posts:
