Apologies -- I didn't realize at first this was sent to me for forwarding. I mistakenly thought I was reading something already forwarded. Kirby ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Übersichtlichkeit <ubersicht@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, May 6, 2012 at 8:12 AM Subject: Re: [Wittrs] Note on a recent reading ('On Wittgenstein' by Hintikka) To: kirby.urner@xxxxxxxxx Please forward to Wittrs, if you will... I want to suggest that Wittgenstein would have had a far more subtle view of happiness than the course, banal, self-satisfied enjoyment or contentment that passes for "happiness" in much popular discourse. Recall Wittgenstein's deathbed remark that he had lived a wonderful life. Recall as well, "I don't know why we are here, but I'm pretty sure that it is not in order to enjoy ourselves." Living life with a sense of wonder and gratitude, with appreciation, even in the face of suffering and adversity, would - or so I take it - have far more to do with Wittgenstein's idea of happiness than the philistine view of simply having things go one's way. And one can surely see how keeping a sense of wonder and gratitude about the world would connect with morality, with happiness, and with the idea of inhabiting what is, in a real sense, a different world from one who is not appreciative. This is a far cry from those who would try to make the wealthy and successful into moral paragons as well, smug in their "happiness". A far cry too from those who would enlist the "prosperity doctrine" to link success to Christian virtue. At the same time, it is silent on the matter of social justice. While Wittgenstein was of course concerned to feed the hungry and heal the sick, he was not one to see happiness in such terms. True happiness is a deeper, more profound issue than contentment or enjoyment. _______________________________________________ Wittrs mailing list Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://undergroundwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/wittrs_undergroundwiki.org