[wisb] Re: Field Guides...

  • From: "Wayne & Susie" <wsrohde@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Mike Duchek" <mikeduchek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:10:29 -0500

I concur with your assessment, Mike.

The back cover advertises the new Stokes guide as "the ultimate field guide 
for today's birder - the biggest, most colorful, most USEFUL [italicized in 
the book] identification guide to birds ever published."

That's quite a claim.  It is colorful, to be sure (it does has very good 
photos).  As for biggest, it's big ... but Sibley (and Crossley) certainly 
take the cake - size-wise and weight-wise.  More importantly, the claim to 
be the most useful ID guide ever published made me wonder if the words 
("most"/"ever") would be backed-up by the text...

The preface contains these words about one of the goals of this guide: "... 
to produce the most USEFUL [italicized] guide to identifying the birds of 
North America ever published..."  Later, in the "how to section," with 
respect to the perennial debate between advocates of photos and advocates of 
drawings, the following appears: "Excellent, well-chosen photographs are 
ALWAYS [italicized] more detailed and more accurate than a drawing."

Really?

One thing's for sure: the authors certainly have a high regard for their 
field guide!

I do like this Stokes better (much better) than the first one.  But for 
quite a variety of reasons (as you mentioned: all the space devoted to rare 
species, subspecies, etc. - even hybrids!) plus the corresponding lack of 
other and more significant and detailed and (yes) useful information, at 
least on on a consistent basis (e.g., more specifics re: habitat, 
differentiation from similar species, etc.), I'm led to the conclusion that 
this guide does have a prominent position among photos guides ... but NOT 
among ID guides as a whole.

The bottom line, in my opinion, is that the new Stokes guide doesn't come 
close to displacing (dare I say?) the real ID guides like Geo and Sibley.

I'll have it on my shelf; maybe even in my van.  But I won't lug it into the 
field while birding.

That's my two cents!

Wayne Rohde
Walworth/Walworth/Walworth, WI 

####################
You received this email because you are subscribed to the Wisconsin Birding 
Network (Wisbirdn).
To UNSUBSCRIBE or SUBSCRIBE, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: 
//www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn
To set DIGEST or VACATION modes, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: 
//www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn
Visit Wisbirdn ARCHIVES at: //www.freelists.org/archives/wisbirdn


Other related posts: