I haven't seen a whole lot of discussion (though I may have missed it) re: some of the newer field guides. Crossley seems to have stirred up a bit of a discussion, though his guide is clearly of a different sort. (And not exactly pocketable!) But I was unaware until fairly recently of a couple of newer photo guides - one by Donald & Llillian Stokes, and another by Brian Small (Princeton series). After Kenn Kaufman came out with his digital photo guide quite a few years ago, both the Smithsonian and National Wildlife Federation guides appeared, and I thought all three were much better (for a variety of reasons) than the original Audubon guides (the series with color plates in one section and text in the other). Among these three, I prefer Kaufman and Smithsonian, for different reasons. I still personally prefer illustrated guides --esp. the Geo guide and Sibley-- for ID purposes. Those two are the cream of the crop in my opinion. But does anyone have any thoughts on the relative merits of the five newer photo guides (Kaufman, Smithsonian, NWF, Princeton and Stokes)? Any thoughts on how the newest ones (Princeton and Stokes) match up to the other three (Kaufman, Smithsonian and NWF)? (One thing I do like about the newest Stokes guide is that there's generally a handful of photos for each species. Much, much better than the original Stokes.) Good birding everyone! May is coming!!! Wayne Rohde Village of Walworth - Walworth County, WI #################### You received this email because you are subscribed to the Wisconsin Birding Network (Wisbirdn). To UNSUBSCRIBE or SUBSCRIBE, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn To set DIGEST or VACATION modes, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn Visit Wisbirdn ARCHIVES at: //www.freelists.org/archives/wisbirdn