[windows2000] Re: WinInfo Daily UPDATE, January 9, 2003

From: "Costanzo, Ray" <rcostanzo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 16:16:26 -0500

I wouldn't know.  I think I was in junior high school at the time.  :P

Ray at work

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Shonk [mailto:JShonk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]=20

> Your right, W95 doesn't belong on a business machine... But it is =3D
> because Win95 was out long before NT 4 so many applications where =3D
> written to the Win95 APIs (Why developers didn't use Win32=20
> API, I don't =3D
> know) Win 3.51 Workstation was not a standard business OS for the =3D
> masses.  going from WFW to Win3.51 didn't seem to make=20
> sense... Going =3D
> from WFW to Win95 did... Also, considering you could upgrade WFW to =3D
> Win95
>=20


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************


==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.

http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm

[windows2000] Re: WinInfo Daily UPDATE, January 9, 2003

Other related posts: